Search Results

The heightened interest level in Fuel Economy for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines the industry has seen over the last few years continues to be high, and is not likely to change. Lowering the fuel consumption of all internal combustion engines remains a priority for years to come, driven by economic, legislative, and environmental reasons. While it is generally assumed that lower viscosity grade lubricants offer fuel economy benefits, there is a lot of confusion about exactly what drives the fuel economy benefits. Fuel Economy claims in trade literature vary over a broad range and it is difficult for the end user to determine what to expect when a change in lubricant viscosity is adopted for a fleet of vehicles in a certain type of operation. This publication makes an attempt at clarifying a number of these uncertainties with the help of additional engine test data, and more extensive data analysis.

Emission legislation for diesel engines is becoming more stringent over time. While the exhaust gas composition requirements for prior iterations of emission legislation could be met with improvements in the engine's combustion process, the next issue of emission limits may require more rigorous measures. In order to meet severe particulate matter limitations, such as those mandated in Japan's new long-term (2005-) emission regulation and in Euro-4 emission legislation, the use of exhaust gas after-treatment systems seems unavoidable. Many engine builders seem to have selected the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) as an integral part of their selected after-treatment strategy. It has been stated that engine lubricants may hurt the durability of such after-treatment systems when oil consumption results in deposit build-up on the DPF walls. This paper describes how a study was performed on the possible impact of engine lubricant composition on DPF plugging.