Search Results

As emission regulations for off-road engines become more and more stringent, alternative fuel off-road engines are being developed rapidly. This paper studies a closed-loop controlled LPG system, which was developed and tested on four lawn and garden engines. The four engines studied are Kohler 18hp, Kohler 13 hp, Briggs & Stratton 6 hp, and Briggs & Stratton 5hp engines, which power Toro walk-behind commercial lawn mowers, John Deere lawn tractors, John Deere walk-behind commercial lawn mowers, and Toro walk-behind commercial lawn mowers, respectively. All engines are four-stroke, spark-ignited and air-cooled. The fuel management system is an air valve based closed-loop controlled dedicated LPG system. The emissions and durability test results are presented. It was found that all engines operating on propane had significantly lower exhaust emissions than those of gasoline baselines.

A CNG bi-fuel version of the Chevrolet Cavalier has been developed as an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) vehicle. The fuel management system is an automatically switching bi-fuel system which is able to control fuel flow rate, spark timing, EGR, and perform OBD-II (On-Board Diagnostics II). The system consists of a CNG fuel tank, fuel filter, electric and manual fuel shutoff valves, high and low pressure regulators, gas mass sensor, mixture control valve, gas distribution system, CNG fuel gauge, OEM exhaust gas oxygen sensor, digital engine control unit (ECU), OEM powertrain control module (PCM) and unique wiring harness. This paper discusses the components, operation, and calibration of the CNG bi-fuel management system. A computer engine simulation model able to predict engine performance, fuel economy, and exhaust emissions, was used to assist spark, fuel, and EGR table mapping.

Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) have long been recognized as ideal clean and potentially available fuels for motor vehicles. However, some disadvantages of the two gaseous fuels such as lower energy density (kW/l) compared to gasoline, a loss of power in unmodified converted engines relative to gasoline and the current shortage of refueling stations hamper their widespread use. Additionally, engines with throttle-body gaseous fuel fumigation need longer cranking time and exhibit relatively slow response during transient engine operation. To alleviate the above shortcomings, a low cost dual-fuel system was developed. The prototype system uses a mixture of gaseous fuel (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) and gasoline to enhance fuel economy, drivability, and lower emissions. The two fuels can be mixed at any percentage depending on the customer's need.

A CNG bi-fuel version of the GMC and Chevrolet C2500 pick up trucks was developed as an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) vehicle. The converted bi-fuel vehicles use the same engine with modifications for use with gaseous fuels, and the same catalytic converters as the gasoline baseline. The fuel management system is an automatic switching bi-fuel system which is able to control fuel flow rate, spark timing, EGR, and perform OBD-II (On-Board Diagnostics II) on both gasoline and CNG. This system has been extensively tested and validated for durability, electro magnetic compatibility requirements, crash integrity, corrosion resistance, emissions performance and powertrain performance under extreme environmental conditions and different CNG fuel compositions. The CNG fuel storage technology of the bi-fuel system was validated to the most stringent safety and durability requirements in the industry.

A group of GM C-2500 heavy-duty and GM C-1500 light-duty trucks were modified to bi-fuel compressed natural gas (CNG)/gasoline and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)/gasoline vehicles. The fuel management systems used for different model year vehicles were introduced. The Alternative Fuel Technology (AFT) System used for 1997 GM C-2500 trucks is discussed in detail. AFT is an automatic switching bi-fuel system which is able to control fuel flow rate, spark timing, and EGR, and perform On-Board Diagnostics (OBD-II). The exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), total hydrocarbon (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) were measured using dilute sampling techniques. The vehicles tested were operated on a chassis dynamometer and run on the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) Urban Schedule.

Five small two-stroke engine designs were tested at different air/fuel ratios, under steady state and transient cycles. The effects of combustion chamber design, carburetor design, lean burning, and fuel composition on performance, hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions were studied. All tested engines had been designed to run richer than stoichiometric in order to obtain satisfactory cooling and higher power. While hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions could be greatly reduced with lean burning, engine durability would be worsened. However, it was shown that the use of a catalytic converter with acceptably lean combustion was an effective method of reducing emissions. Replacing carburetion with in-cylinder fuel injection in one of the engines resulted in a significant reduction of hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions.

Gaseous and particulate emissions from heavy-duty vehicles are affected by fuel types, vehicle/engine parameters, driving characteristics, and environmental conditions. Transient chassis tests were conducted on twenty-six heavy-duty vehicles fueled with methanol, compressed natural gas (CNG), #1 diesel, and #2 diesel, using West Virginia University (WVU) Transportable Heavy-Duty Vehicle Emissions Testing Laboratory. The vehicles were operated on the central business district (CBD) testing cycle, and regulated emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), total hydrocarbon (HC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter (PM) were measured. Comparisons of regulated emissions results revealed that the vehicles powered on methanol and CNG produced much lower particulate emissions than the conventionally fueled vehicles.

The West Virginia University (WVU) Transportable Heavy-Duty Vehicle Emissions Testing Laboratory was employed to conduct chassis dynamometer tests in the field to measure the exhaust emissions from heavy-duty buses and trucks. This laboratory began operation in the field in January, 1992. During the period January, 1992 through June, 1993, over 150 city buses, trucks, and tractors operated by 18 different authorities in 11 states were tested by the facility. The tested vehicles were powered by 14 different types of engines fueled with natural gas (CNG or LNG), methanol, ethanol, liquified petroleum gas (LPG), #2 diesel, and low sulfur diesel (#1 diesel or Jet A). Some of the tested vehicles were equipped with exhaust after-treatment systems. In this paper, a total of 12 CNG-fueled and #2 diesel-fueled transit buses equipped with Cummins L-10 engines, were chosen for investigation.

A set of experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance differences between a Low Heat Rejection Engine (LHRE) which is ceramic-insulated and a conventional baseline metal diesel engine which is water-cooled. Both engines were single cylinder, direct injection, and turbocharged. The objective of the study was to investigate the rate of heat release of these engines so that performance improvement procedures could be obtained. In this paper, the difference of the ignition delay between the two engines was determined. Two methods for improving the combustion process of the LHRE were studied: use of mixture fuels and increase the fuel injection rate. Both methods proved effective and reduced the fuel consumption rate of the LHRE.