Search Results

Three alternatives to internal combustion vehicles currently being researched, developed, and commercialized are electric, hybrid electric, and fuel-cell vehicles. A total life-cycle inventory for an alternative vehicle must include factors such as the impacts of car body materials, tires, and paints. However, these issues are shared with gasoline-powered vehicles; the most significant difference between these vehicles is the power source. This paper focuses on the most distinct and challenging aspect of alternative-fuel vehicles, the power sources. The life-cycle impacts of battery systems for electric and hybrid vehicles are assessed. Less data is publicly available on the fuel cell; however, we offer a preliminary discussion of the environmental issues unique to fuel cells. For each of these alternative vehicles, a primary environmental hurdle is the consumption of materials specific to the power sources.

The paper analyzes energy use and emissions per GJ of various fuels delivered to the vehicle fuel tank, covering extraction, fuel production, transportation, storage, and distribution phases of the life cycle of alternative fuels. Drawing on a number of existing studies, the modeling issues and approaches, main results and insights are summarized. The range of estimates in various studies is large; however, common patterns can be observed. The analysis indicates, that conventional gasoline fuel cycle has robust advantages with respect to energy efficiency, conventional pollutant emissions, and most importantly, existing infrastructure compared to alternative fuels. Fossil fuel based alternatives like CNG, NG–Methanol, NG–FTL do not result in significant improvement in fuel cycle environmental performance. Biofuels offer the benefits of lower and even negative GHG emissions, sustainability, and domestic fuel production.