Refine Your Search

Search Results

Author:
Viewing 1 to 3 of 3
Technical Paper

Optimization Design of FoamIPillar for Head Impact Protection Using Design of Experiment Approach

1997-04-08
971543
This paper presents a method to obtain improved foam/pillar structural designs to help enhance occupant interior impact protection. Energy absorbing foams are used in this study with their thickness and crush strength being selected as primary design variables for optimization. The response surface techniques in the design of experiment are used in the optimization process. Head impact analyses are conducted by a CAE model with explicit, nonlinear, dynamic finite element code LS-DYNA3D. A baseline model is developed and verified by comparing the simulation results with the experimental data. Based on this model, the anticipated effects of stiffness of the pillar structure and the trim on the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) results are also assessed. The optimization approach in this study provides a comprehensive consideration of the factors which affect the HIC value.
Technical Paper

Comparative Analysis of Different Energy Absorbing Materials for Interior Head Impact

1995-02-01
950332
Various foam models are developed using LS-DYNA3D and validated against experiments. Dynamic and static stress-strain relations are obtained experimentally for crushable and resilient foam materials and used as inputs to the finite element analyses. Comparisons of the results obtained from different foam models with test data show excellent correlations for all the cases studied.
Technical Paper

Estimating the Minimum Space to Meet Federal Interior Head Impact Requirement

1995-02-01
950333
NHTSA is expected to publish a final rule on Interior Head Impact (as an amendment to FMVSS 201) by early 1995. One of the Interior Head Impact Study objectives is to develop a methodology for estimating the minimum head impact space requirements to meet this regulation. The physical parameters affecting the HIC (Head Injury Criterion) are impact velocity, maximum headform stopping distance, peak deceleration, and pulse duration. The equations for estimating the HIC vs. Head Impact Space Requirements are formulated by relating these physical parameters to the Idealized Waveforms of Square Wave, Sine Wave, and Haversine Wave. This methodology has been extended to include the Generic Waveform. Tabulations of Maximum Headform Stopping Distance Requirement vs. Peak Deceleration, Pulse Duration, and HIC for the three Idealized Waveforms at 6.7 m/s (15 mph) impact speed have been generated to provide an estimate of the head impact package space requirement.
X