Search Results

Recently, significantly more demanding emissions standards for the Mercosur region were proposed, and the intention is that these will be introduced in 2004 and 2008. This paper describes the development of new high performance three-way catalyst formulations for conventional gasoline/gasohol fueled engines that enables them to meet these stringent standards without increasing the content of platinum group metals above the levels currently employed. The performance benefits of these advanced platinum and palladium-based catalysts are demonstrated on both engine bench and vehicles.

This paper discusses the development of a new approach to achieving EURO 4 emission standards with a simplified exhaust after-treatment system in combination with an air-assisted lean stratified Direct Injection system. The results presented demonstrate the ability of the air-assist DI system to operate in highly stratified conditions at very lean A/F ratios, with excellent control of the raw HC and NOx emissions. In most cases the authors illustrate that with good stratified combustion control, the HC emissions can be lower than the baseline port injected stoichiometric engine. Further, the high tolerance to EGR and accurate A/F control at the spark plug enable the raw NOx emissions to be reduced by up to 85% over the European drive cycle in comparison to the baseline port injected engine with EGR.

The control of emissions from mobile sources continues to play an important part in air quality improvement. Future reductions in vehicle emissions are proposed or legislated in many countries throughout the world. The most stringent of these standards under discussion are those in the Californian LEV-II proposal, a part of which is the SULEV standard which requires a large reduction in hydrocarbon emissions, together with a significant decrease in NOx, over those legislated for ULEV. This requires the engine and aftertreatment system to deliver both a substantial reduction in the emissions of hydrocarbon during engine warm-up and increased NOx conversion during high speed operation, compared to previous ULEV systems. In this paper we outline three different catalyst systems which show the potential to provide reduction in vehicle emissions below the currently legislated ULEV and European Stage IV standards.

In order to meet future emission standards for gasoline vehicles, catalyst designers have developed thermally durable three-way catalysts with enhanced activity. The most effective catalysts for achieving the required hydrocarbon conversion were those containing high levels of palladium. This has led to increased levels of palladium being used. Recent palladium price fluctuations have created interest in the possibility of using advanced platinum-based technologies. The performance of a new platinum-rhodium three-way catalyst (TWC) was compared with an advanced palladium-rhodium catalyst on an engine test-bed. The results showed the new platinum-rhodium catalyst gave equivalent, or better, performance at similar total precious metal cost. The performance on selected vehicles confirmed future emissions standards can be achieved with platinum-based catalysts.

Emission of carbon dioxide from mobile sources is receiving interest as part of a coordinated approach to limit greenhouse gases. Coupled with the relatively high price of gasoline in some countries this has resulted in the development of lean burn and direct injection gasoline engines. These engines will require conversion of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in excess of 70% in a net oxygen rich exhaust stream to meet future emission limits. This paper describes recent advances in the performance of NOx trap technology in terms of adsorption capacity, temperature of operation and thermal durability. The application of a new NOx trap together with a newly developed starter catalyst, to a direct injection gasoline vehicle shows that European stage IV limits can be reached for NOx and CO with a fresh system.

This paper describes the use of advanced three-way catalysts to meet future European and California low emissions legislation. Firstly, it describes the performance of these catalysts tested using the European Stage II test cycle and contrasts their emissions performance over the proposed European Stage III test. The future legislation requires fast catalyst light-off for the low emissions standards to be achieved, therefore the performance of close-coupled catalysts was investigated. The close-coupled catalyst systems gave very low emissions. Space constraints often preclude the use of large volume close-coupled catalysts, and the combination of a small starter catalyst with an underfloor catalyst was tested. This gave performance levels better than the close-coupled configuration. The effect of reducing the underfloor catalyst volume is also described. The work was carried out on a 1.2 litre European Vehicle, the conclusions were verified on a 1.6 litre European vehicle.

One possibility to improve the fuel economy of SI-engines is to run the engine with a lean air-fuel-ratio (AFR). Hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide after-treatment has been proven under lean operation, but NOx-control remains a challenge to catalyst and car manufacturers. One strategy that is being considered is to run the engine lean with occasional operation at stoichiometry. This would be in conjunction with a three-way-catalyst (TWC) to achieve stoichiometric conversion of the three main pollutants in the normal way and a NOx trap. The NOx trap stores NOx under lean operation to be released and reduced under rich conditions. The trap also functions as a TWC and has good HC and CO conversion at both lean and stoichiometric AFR's. Under lean conditions NO is oxidised to NO2 on Pt which is then adsorbed on an oxide surface. Typical adsorbent materials include oxides of potassium, calcium, zirconium, strontium, lanthanum, cerium and barium.

In a collaborative programme, the effects of gasoline sulphur content on regulated emissions from three-way catalyst equipped vehicles have been studied. The programme evaluated the sulphur tolerance of three different catalyst formulations on the same range of vehicles. The catalyst chemistries were chosen to be representative of typical current formulations in different markets, as follows: 1. Platinum/Rhodium (Pt/Rh) 2. Platinum/Rhodium/Nickel (Pt/Rh/Ni) 3. Palladium/Rhodium (Pd/Rh) Each vehicle/catalyst combination was tested with fuels containing sulphur at nominal levels of 50, 250 and 450 ppm weight. All fuels were produced using the low sulphur fuel as a base and doping to 250 and 450 ppm S with a mixture of nine sulphur compounds, typical of those actually occurring in European gasolines. The results show clear differences between the magnitudes of the sulphur effect with different catalyst formulations.

Enhancements in the thermal stability of three-way catalysts have been achieved by: 1) developing improved methods for the incorporation of ceria into catalyst formulations and 2) identifying a proprietary stabilizer which reduces the rate of ceria sintering at high temperature. Improvements in thermal stability are demonstrated by comparing the FTP and engine dynamometer performance of new formulations with a standard formulation after aging on several high temperature engine dynamometer cycles.

The development of technology suitable for meeting the CARB Ultra-low- emission-vehicle (ULEV) legislation has now become a main focus for vehicle manufacturers worldwide. This proliferation of interest is mainly a result of the increasing number of eastern US-states currently considering the adoption of CARB legislation and the indication that emission legislation in Europe and Japan for the turn of the century is likely to be of the same severity as CARB ULEV legislation. Current three way catalyst (TWC) emissions control technology suffers from low catalytic conversion efficiency of HC, CO and NOx pollutants during cold operation i.e. before catalyst light off. Cold start emissions generally contribute up to 70% of HC and CO tailpipe emissions during an FTP test. However, in some cases even early light-off of the catalyst, similar to hot operation is not sufficient to achieve catalytic conversion over a test cycle to reach ULEV emissions levels.