1988-02-01

A Review and Evaluation of Various HIC Algorithms 880656

Various algorithms such as a direct computation approach, maximization requirement criteria method established by Chou and Nyquist, and a partitioning technique, for computing HIC are reviewed in this paper. An evaluation has been conducted considering both the accuracy and efficiency of these algorithms using theoretical pulses and experimental resultant head accelerations of a dummy obtained from the literature, Hyge sled and frontal barrier impact tests. Using results obtained from direct computations as “exact” values for comparison, all the algorithms evaluated provide HIC estimates in close agreement with the “exact” values. The CPU times, which are used as a measure for the assessment of computational efficiency, vary from algorithm to algorithm. Methods using a partitioning logic developed by Mentzer and a faster algorithm developed by Holstein and Alem are found to be very efficient, and are recommended for use in the computation of HIC.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 16% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

Head Injury Criterion (HIC) Calculation Using an Optimization Approach

971046

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Comparative Evaluation of the Biofidelity of EUROSID and SID Side Impact Dummies

881717

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

A Comparison of the Head and Neck Injury Parameters on a TNO P3 and a Three-year-old Hybrid III Child Dummies From Numerical Simulations

2005-01-1303

View Details

X