1981-02-01

An Alternative to Percentile Models 810217

Percentile values are valuable statistics for representing the extreme ends of a distribution of sizes for a single human body dimension; however, their use is not suitable to every problem. When it is desirable to combine dimensions in order to construct a model of the human body or any of its parts, percentiles can create problems due to the fact that, with the exception of 50th percentiles, percentile values are not additive. This report demonstrates the seriousness of the problems associated with the use of percentiles, and describes and compares an alternative approach for representing human body size variability. This alternative, which utilizes regression equations, offers a solution which is easily accessible and demonstrably an improvement over percentiles for the purpose of creating human models.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 16% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

A Validation Method for Digital Human Anthropometry: Towards the Standardization of Validation and Verification

2004-01-2191

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Multivariate Accommodation Models using Traditional and 3D Anthropometry

2005-01-2735

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Assessing the Accuracy of Ergonomic Analyses when Human Anthropometry is Scaled in a Virtual Environment

2006-01-2319

View Details

X