Comparative Study between Equivalent Circuit and Recurrent Neural Network Battery Voltage Models 2021-01-0759
Lithium-ion battery (LIB) terminal voltage models are investigated using two modelling approaches. The first model is a third-order Thevenin equivalent circuit model (ECM), which consists of an open-circuit voltage in series with a nonlinear resistance and three parallel RC pairs. The parameters of the ECM are obtained by fitting the model to hybrid pulse power characterization (HPPC) test data. The parametrization of the ECM is performed through quadratic-based programming. The second is a novel modelling approach based on long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks to estimate the battery terminal voltage. The LSTM is trained on multiple vehicle drive cycles at six different temperatures, including −20°C, without the necessity of battery characterization tests. The performance of both models is evaluated with four automotive drive cycles at each temperature. The results show that both models achieve acceptable performance at all temperatures. However, the LSTM performs better in 92% of the cases, especially at lower temperatures, where it has as much as two-thirds lower error than the ECM approach.
Citation: Naguib, M., Vidal, C., Kollmeyer, P., Malysz, P. et al., "Comparative Study between Equivalent Circuit and Recurrent Neural Network Battery Voltage Models," SAE Technical Paper 2021-01-0759, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-01-0759. Download Citation
Author(s):
Mina Naguib, Carlos Vidal, Phillip Kollmeyer, Pawel Malysz, Oliver Gross, Ali Emadi
Affiliated:
McMaster University, FCA US LLC
Pages: 8
Event:
SAE WCX Digital Summit
ISSN:
0148-7191
e-ISSN:
2688-3627
Related Topics:
Lithium-ion batteries
Neural networks
Connectors and terminals
Batteries
SAE MOBILUS
Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content.
Learn More »