Refine Your Search

Search Results

Author:
Viewing 1 to 2 of 2
Technical Paper

School Bus Visibility: Driver's Field of View and Performance of Mirror Systems on a Conventional Long-Nosed School Bus

1998-02-23
980923
This report presents the results of the driver's field of view and the performance of six crossview and two sideview mirror systems on a conventional long-nosed school bus. It also contains an evaluation of the image quality of the crossview mirrors in terms of the angular length and width of their reflected images. The measurements of the field of view and the evaluation of image quality were done at two driver eye locations, one representative of the cyclopian view of a 95th percentile adult male and the other one representative of the cyclopian view of a 5th percentile adult female. Measurements were taken considering that there were no head movements. For the purposes of the study, the term “blind spot” was defined as meaning any area that could not be seen directly by the driver. The performance of the mirrors was judged in terms of their capacity to provide a complete and clear view of the blind spots.
Technical Paper

The Effects of Image Size and Luminance Contrast on Object Detection and Discrimination in Cross View Mirrors

1997-02-24
970232
This report presents results from a performance evaluation study on the adequacy of the image size, within school bus cross view mirrors, mandated by FMVSS 111 The mandated image size is 9X3 minutes of arc (ie, 9′X3′) Six observers discriminated the orientation offset of three different image sizes (ie, 45′X15′, 9′X3′, 13.5′X45′) presented onto a banana type cross view mirror. The images were presented to observers under three luminance contrast levels 15%, 20%, and 25%. Results indicated that poor performance was associated with the 45′X15′ image size at all contrast levels and the 9′X3′ image size at a luminance contrast of 15%. The 135′X45′ image size was associated with good performance. In conclusion, measures of performance failed to demonstrate an unequivocal deficiency of the 9′X3′ image size.
X