Search Results

In July 2002, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers and the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association released the results of a 6-year, two-part vehicle fleet test program to determine the effects of methyl-cyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT®*) on vehicles equipped with state of the art emission control systems. Analysis of the data reports from this study shows that all of the vehicles met applicable emission standards, even though the fleet accumulated mileage under very severe conditions that accelerate degradation of vehicle emission control systems in excess of that expected from actual vehicle mileage. The study also demonstrated that gasoline-containing MMT had no adverse impact on vehicular emission control equipment.

The International Lubricant Standardization and Approval Committee (ILSAC) GF-2 specification requires Passenger Car Motor Oils to provide enhanced fuel economy in a modern low friction engine (ASTM Sequence VIA). The durability of this fuel economy improvement is becoming increasingly important and will be addressed in the successor to the Sequence VIA, the Sequence VIB, which proposed for ILSAC GF-3. Previous investigations have indicated that the choice of detergent system and friction modifier have a large impact on the fuel economy of a lubricant, and this study was designed to analyze these effects further. The work was carried out in three phases. In the first phase, seven detergent systems were evaluated and compared to currently available GF-2 lubricant in a vehicle equipped with a 4.6L SOHC V8 engine using a 500-mile Accelerated Mileage Accumulation (AMA) cycle.

This paper describes experiments conducted to determine Federal Test Procedure (FTP) exhaust emissions, ozone-forming potentials, specific reactivities, and reactivity adjustment factors for several butane/propane alternative fuel blends run on a light-duty EHC-equipped gasoline vehicle converted to operate on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Duplicate emission tests were conducted on the light-duty vehicle at each test condition using appropriate EPA FTP test protocol. Hydrocarbon speciation was utilized to determine reactivity-adjusted non-methane organic gas (NMOG) emissions for one test on each fuel.

This paper describes experiments conducted to determine the regulated emissions, ozone-forming potentials, specific reactivities, and reactivity adjustment factors for eight butane and propane alternative fuel blends run on a light-duty vehicle, emission certified to be a California transitional low emission vehicle (TLEV) and converted to operate on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Duplicate EPA FTP emission tests were conducted with each fuel. Hydrocarbon speciation was utilized to determine reactivity-adjusted non-methane organic gases (NMOG) emissions for one test on each fuel. Results showed that all eight fuels could allow the converted vehicle to pass California ultra-low emission vehicle (ULEV) NMOG and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) standards. Six of the eight fuels could allow the vehicle to pass ULEV carbon monoxide (CO) standards. BUTANE has been an important gasoline blending component for many years.

This paper describes experiments conducted to determine the ozone-forming potentials, specific reactivities, and reactivity adjustment factors for various heavy-duty engines operating on “industry average” (RF-A) gasoline, California Phase 2 gasoline, compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and diesel fuel. Each engine/fuel combination was tested in triplicate using the EPA heavy-duty transient cold- and hot-start test protocol. Hydrocarbon speciation was conducted for all tests to allow for the determination of ozone-forming potentials, using California Air Resources Board maximum incremental reactivity factors as well as determination of the Clean Air Act “toxic” emissions.

Development of methodology for diesel hydrocarbon speciation of C12-C22 compounds and the application of that methodology to determine total ozone forming potential of diesel exhaust emissions is an extremely complicated task. Methodology has already been developed for speciating C1-C12 exhaust emissions from engines and vehicles fueled with gasoline, diesel, and alternate fuels. However, very little or no information is available for exhaust speciation of C12-C22 compounds as sampling and analytical constraints make the collection and analysis of the higher molecular weight compounds extremely challenging. Key issues related to the definition of “hydrocarbons” also need to be addressed prior to promulgation of future reactivity-based legislation for diesels (e.g., Which exhaust hydrocarbon compounds actually exist in gas-phase and participate in atmospheric ozone formation?).

The use of methanol as a “clean fuel” appears to be a viable approach to reduce air pollution. However, concern has been expressed about potentially high formaldehyde emissions from stoichiometrically operated light-duty vehicles. This paper presents results from Task 1 of an emission test program conducted for the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) to identify advanced catalyst technology to reduce formaldehyde emissions without compromising regulated emission control. A hybrid M90 test vehicle was used to evaluate 18 unaged catalyst systems for formaldehyde, methanol, gasoline derived hydrocarbon, organic material hydrocarbon equivalent mass, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen emissions. The vehicle was operated on a chassis dynamometer using the FTP driving cycle. Catalyst systems evaluated included electrically-heated, manifold, close-coupled, and underbody catalysts, as well as combinations of the above.