Search Results

Soot accumulation in diesel engine crankcase is the dominant factor which governs engine oil drain interval. So, efficient soot elimination from crankcase oil can be a practical way to achieve drain interval extension. Combination of high performance oil filter and low soot dispersancy oil results in an effective measure to trap soot efficiently. In this paper, the behavior of newly developed high performance diesel engine oil having low soot dispersancy is reported. Prior to oil development, an evaluation method of soot dispersancy in oil was elaborated. Based on relative viscosity defined as ratio of soot containing oil viscosity to soot eliminated oil viscosity, dispersancy parameter was determined. Oil dispersancy evaluated on this parameter agreed with the results obtained from particle size analyzer. Secondly, a method to obtain oil filter soot trap rate to total soot contaminated into crankcase (trap rate) was established.

Analysis results of used oils sampled from many engines operating in the field show that the most critical factor governing the limits of oil use is insoluble fraction concentration in oil. Hence, the authors developed a new oil and by-pass oil filter to increase soot trapping efficiency, so as to extend oil change interval. Soot trapping efficiency could be improved from 30% to more than 80% using a bigger oil filter with fine mesh and a newly developed low soot dispersancy oil. Engine lubrication performance of the new oil was compared to that of standard and commercial long-drain oils by conducting 300-hour endurance tests on an 11.7 liter direct injection, turbocharged and aftercooled diesel engine at rated output. Test results proved superior engine lubrication performance of the new oil. THE INTERVAL between lubricating oil changes for diesel engines is twenty to forty thousand kilometers, depending on engine manufacturers' recommendations (1)*.

Evaporative cooling was applied to a heavy duty diesel engine to investigate the feasibility of this cooling method. Engine test results showed the following benefits of this cooling method: Reduction of the size of theradiator and cooling fan is feasible. The maximum temperature of the combustion chamber wall did not increase, though the coolant temperature rose by 20°C. The fuel consumption could be reduced especially at partial load. Engine warm-up performance was significantly improved. An oil cooler rig test was also conducted to investigate the heat transfer characteristics of the oil cooler with evaporative cooling.