Search Results

Run off road events are frequent and can result in severe consequences. The reasons for leaving the road are numerous and the sequence the car is exerted to differs in most events. The objective of this study is to identify different situations and mechanisms both in respect to accident avoidance and occupant protection and to present test methods addressing the different identified mechanisms of run off road occupant safety. Mechanisms and influencing factors are identified using statistical and in-depth crash data as well as driving data. There are a number of reasons for leaving the road; driver fatigue, driver distraction and inadequate speed in relation to the traffic situation to mention a few. An outline of principle test methods for evaluating technology assisting the driver to stay on the road is presented in relation to the identified situations and mechanisms. Crash test methods for some typical run off road scenarios are suggested.

This paper first discusses the advancement and challenges in the areas of developing Collision Avoidance Systems, or CAS. CAS have been on the market for a decade, and their development has been rapid. Starting with forward collision warning with brake support, targeting vehicles moving in the same direction in front of the car, CAS now cover pedestrians and cyclists in front of the car as well as vehicles standing still and even some situations of approaching vehicles in crossings. This development up to date is described and discussed according to the challenge areas of detection, decision strategy and intervention strategy. Next, the paper discusses assessment of system effects on driving safety. Numerous studies have tried to predict the effect of various CAS, and the real world effect of these systems has been shown to be significant.

Different types of driver workload are suggested to impact driving performance. Operating a vehicle in a situation where the driver feel uneasy is one example of driver workload. In this study, passenger car driving data collected with Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) data acquisition equipment was analyzed, aiming to identify situations corresponding to a high driver's subjective rating of ‘unease’. Data from an experimental study with subjects driving a passenger car in normal traffic was used. Situations were rated by the subjects according to experienced ‘unease’, and the Controller Area Network (CAN) data from the vehicle was used to describe the driving conditions and identify driving patterns corresponding to the situations rated as ‘uneasy’. These driving patterns were matched with the data in a NDS database and the method was validated using video data. Two data mining approaches were applied.

Neck injuries resulting from rear end car impacts have attracted increasing attention in recent years. Although usually not life-threatening these injuries can have long-term consequences. The exact mechanism of injury has not yet been established. Several probable mechanisms occurring at different phases during the crash sequence have been suggested by researchers. The accident experience with existing seat and head restraint designs is summarized. The results show that there are many factors influencing the risk of neck injury. A high and fixed-in-position head restraint, positioned close to the head, is beneficial. Also, Individual factors, such as gender and height, and seating position, are shown to have influence on the injury risk.

Frontal Severe Partial Overlap Collisions (SPOC) also called small overlap crashes pose special challenges with respect to structural design as well as occupant protection. In the early 1990s, the SPOC test method was developed addressing 20-40% overlap against a fixed rigid barrier with initial velocities up to 65 km/h. The knowledge gained has been used in the design of Volvo vehicles since then. Important design principles include front side members orientated along the wheel envelopes together with a strong support structure utilizing a space frame principle with beams loaded mainly in tension and compression. This novel setup was first introduced in the 850-model in 1991 and has been refined and patented (2001) in later Volvo front structures. Among the design principles are multiple front side members on each side, helping energy absorption efficiency and robustness.

A positive trend to more frequent use of child restraint systems (CRS) in Sweden, during the last 20 years, is shown in this report. During the same period, the overall injury risk, for different age groups of child occupants, has decreased substantially. This indicates the high effectiveness of the child restraint systems. Children need car occupant safety systems specially designed for their size. This paper clearly states the need for child safety systems and discusses benefits and drawbacks with regard to different restraints, ages and injuries. The analysis points out, that when a crash occurs, the maximum effect of a child restraint system is not reached, if the child is not using the correct system for their size. There is even a tendency that the injury risk increases when children switch from one restraint system to another, i.e. are at the youngest ages for which the specific restraint is recommended. The background data used, is based on Volvo's traffic accident research.

Vertical loading can cause thoracic and lumbar spine injuries to a car occupant. Crashes potentially causing occupant vertical loads include; rollover events or free flying events when the car lands on its wheels, and run off road events when the car goes into the ditch and collides with an embankment. To date, there is no standardized test method evaluating this occupant loading mechanism. The aim of this study was to develop test methods addressing vertical occupant loading for car occupants and to evaluate countermeasures for reduction of such loads. Based on real world run off road crashes, representative test track methods were developed. These complete vehicle test track methods were used to provide input to a simplified and repeatable rig test method. The rig test method comprises a dummy positioned in a seat attached to a frame and exposed to a vertical acceleration. Vertical pelvis acceleration is monitored, as an indication of potential loads through the spine.