Technical Paper
Design for Assembly (DFA) - The Key to Making Parts-Count Reduction Profitable
1999-06-05
1999-01-2281
This paper explains, via specific examples, that no one-to-one correlation exists between design for assembly and parts-count reduction. It explains how overall cost reductions cannot be maximized if the cost of each and every step in a process is minimized separately, as it occurs. A distinction is drawn between goals and the metrics used to measure satisfaction of the goals, and concern is expressed at how frequently one now sees the metric usurping the function of the original goal - to the extent that satisfying the metric can result in directly violating what once was the goal. Illustrations are provided of how, and when, parts consolidation can be of overall benefit. Other examples reveal how parts-count reduction has been counterproductive. A better metric, interface control, is recommended as an alternative.