Search Results

A myriad of topology optimization tools exist today in the market that use automated under-the-hood structural simulations. All the user needs is to provide is the current shape of the part, or the maximum space that the part is allowed to occupy, and the maximum loads that it will experience. Though this technology has existed for over 25 years, recent advances in Additive Manufacturing (AM) have now enabled fabrication of hitherto-infeasible parts, both quickly and inexpensively. A quick cursory literature search on successful implementation of topology optimization reveals that a majority of the attention has been focused on structural components and assemblies subjected to known service load(s) [1,2,3]. Therein lies one of the disadvantages experienced in the state-of-the-art today, especially for the military industry.

It is of considerable interest to developers of military vehicles, in early phases of the concept design process as well as in Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) phase, to quickly predict occupant injury risk due to under-body blast loading. The most common occupant injuries in these extremely short duration events arise out of the very high vertical acceleration of vehicle due to its close proximity to hot high pressure gases from the blast. In a prior study [16], an extensive parametric study was conducted in a systematic manner so as to create look-up tables or automated software tools that decision-makers can use to quickly estimate the different injury responses for both stroking and non-stroking seat systems in terms of a suitable blast load parameter. The primary objective of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of using such a tool in lieu of building a detailed model for simulation and occupant injury assessment.

Occupant knee impact simulations are performed in the automotive industry as an integrated design process during the course of instrument panel (IP) development. All major automakers have different categories of dynamic testing methods as part of their design process in validating their designs against the FMVSS 208 requirement. This has given rise to a corresponding number of knee impact simulations performed at various stages of product development. This paper investigates the advantages and disadvantages of various types of these knee impact simulations. Only the knee load requirement portion of the FMVSS208 is considered in this paper.

This paper presents an unambiguous and intuitive method for identification of steering column resonant (SCR) mode of vibration. One simple but overlooked technique to determine the SCR mode in-vehicle is to provide local stiffnesses of the body locations where the Instrument Panel (IP) attaches, to the IP suppliers to be used in their design and development. This paper describes how this technique is useful in predicting the first few important in-vehicle steering column modes for different classes of vehicles, with examples presented in each class. The results obtained from such analyses are compared against those from direct in-buck simulations. This technique is not limited to its application in developing IP systems, but can easily be extended to include other systems such as seats, fuel tanks, etc. Also it is shown that a design optimization analysis may be performed using these attachment stiffnesses as design variables resulting in a system level solution.

The increased focus on cost reduction remains one of the major interests of the global automotive industry in general and of interior systems suppliers in particular. This emphasis is heightened due to globalization and expansion of automotive OEMs in their product line, so that they may participate and compete in lower priced niche markets. The cost of plastic components in the automotive interior is about $500 per vehicle, of which a significant portion is material cost alone. Low cost materials hitherto not considered traditional autoplastics are making inroads due to the advancements in the interior component manufacturing technology. This paper describes the process of material selection for IPs using Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) tools to evaluate their functional requirements, such as noise vibration and harshness (NVH), sunload deformations, and safety performance.

The increased focus on occupant protection by automobile manufacturers combined with incessant consumer demand for safety features such as dual airbags has posed design engineers with major challenges in the field of Instrument Panel (IP) design. Typically, airbags are designed to deploy when the speed of the automobile is above 13 mph in a frontal impact. The airbag door should meet head impact requirements for unbelted occupants involved in low speed impacts (<15mph) when airbags are not deployed. This paper describes how computer aided engineering (CAE) simulation techniques were used in improving the design of the passenger airbag door of a full size van for head impact performance. Fewer tests were conducted primarily for validation, which resulted in significantly less prototypes, costs and time.