Search Results

The rapid advancement of diesel engine technology as used in European passenger cars brings greater demands for the provision of high-quality diesel fuel and premium performance fuels. Fuel additives play an increasingly important role in enhancing fuel quality and meeting the demands of these new engine technologies. The development of these additives and appropriate fuels relies on engine test procedures that can accurately simulate the performance of the fuel in consumer vehicles. The value of such tests is greatest when the test cycle, operating parameters and test fuel have relevant correlation to those experienced by a vehicle in actual consumer use. This paper considers the DW10 injector fouling test currently under development within the CEC and highlights the methods used to increase the severity. Conventional fuel additives currently used in premium fuels offer superb protection against the deposit formation seen in this test.

Since the introduction of the catalytic converter, some automobile manufacturers have questioned whether the converter is compatible with the use of the gasoline fuel additive MMT®. Concerns have generally revolved around possible interactions between combustion products of MMT® (i.e., manganese containing compounds) and catalytic converters. In particular, concern has been raised over the possibility that MMT® combustion products physically “plug” the catalyst and cause catalyst failure, where plugging refers to blockage of contiguous pores at the catalyst inlet face or within the body of the converter. In modern vehicles this could result in the illumination of the malfunction indicator light (MIL) due to storing of an on-board diagnostic (OBD) failure code pertaining to catalyst operation or failure of a vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) test.

This paper presents the results of a three city survey designed to determine the relative frequency of illumination of vehicle on-board diagnostic (OBD) malfunction indicator lights (MIL) on 2001 and later model year vehicles. The survey was conducted in a Canadian market, Regina, and two U.S. markets, Minneapolis and Denver, to assess claims that the presence of methycyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT®) in gasoline causes the failure of technology necessary to meet stringent Tier 2 emission standards applicable in North America. The results of the survey do not support the claim that MMT® is incompatible with the effective functioning of the advanced vehicle emission technology necessary to meet Tier 2 emission standards. The results substantiate that the performance of the most advanced vehicles operating on gasoline containing MMT® is not materially different from the performance of comparable vehicles operating on gasoline that does not contain MMT®.

In July 2002, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers and the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association released the results of a 6-year, two-part vehicle fleet test program to determine the effects of methyl-cyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT®*) on vehicles equipped with state of the art emission control systems. Analysis of the data reports from this study shows that all of the vehicles met applicable emission standards, even though the fleet accumulated mileage under very severe conditions that accelerate degradation of vehicle emission control systems in excess of that expected from actual vehicle mileage. The study also demonstrated that gasoline-containing MMT had no adverse impact on vehicular emission control equipment.

Control and elimination of mobil-source particulate matter (PM) emissions is of increasing interest to engineers and scientists as regulators in industrialized countries promulgate lower emission levels in diesel engines. Relative to their gasoline engine counterparts, today's diesel engines, in general, still emit a higher mass of PM. While strictly speaking, this PM is an agglomeration of organic and inorganic particles, the predominant component is carbon and is commonly referred to as “soot”. For mobil-source PM control, one of the current preferred technologies is the ceramic closed-cell monolith Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF). Ideally, DPFs accumulate and store PM during low speed/temperature engine operation and burn the accumulated PM during high speed/temperature operation.

Throughout the world, governments are promulgating regulations that are intended to improve air quality. Some of these regulations affect the physical and chemical properties of gasoline. Consequently, refiners are under increasing pressure to reformulate their gasoline to be lower emitting when handled and combusted. These regulatory actions have also greatly reduced flexibility in the fuel formulation process. In many cases, refiners are attempting to reduce gasoline vapor pressure, sulfur, aromatic, and olefin content while simultaneously tightening distillation characteristics by removing butane and reducing the use of heavy reformate and FCC fractions. Because butane, aromatics and olefins can contribute substantially to pool octane levels, blending clean-burning gasoline with the required octane rating for acceptable vehicle performance can be difficult.

SAE Paper 2002-01-2894 entitled, “The Impact of MMT Gasoline Additive on Exhaust Emissions and Fuel Economy of Low Emission Vehicles (LEV)” presents discussion and conclusions concerning the emissions from vehicles that accumulated mileage on gasoline with and without the fuel additive, methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (or MMT®). Although the authors of the paper express concern about use of MMT®, the data on which the authors rely are consistent with the results and conclusions from prior evaluations of MMT® which have found that MMT® is compatible with effective emission control system operation (1,2,3). All vehicles tested in the study met the emission standards for all pollutants that apply to the test vehicles in-use and analysis of the data show MMT® had no effect on fuel economy.

The long-term durability of a vehicle's exhaust catalyst is essential for emission control. Catalyst durability can be affected by a variety of factors including engine oil consumption. During normal engine operation, some of the lubricating oil is combusted. The deposition of combustion products from phosphorus containing lubricant additives on the catalyst can adversely affect catalyst durability. In an attempt to minimize the impact of oil consumption on additive performance, engines have been designed to reduce oil consumption and oils are being formulated with lower concentrations of phosphorus compounds. However, these phosphorus compounds protect the engine from excessive wear and cannot be easily removed from lubricant oil due to concerns over engine durability. The use of a phosphorus scavenger is an approach that works together with engine design to minimize catalyst deterioration.

Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from light-duty vehicles have received attention recently because of increased focus on global warming and climate change. Relative to emissions of regulated pollutants like hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from all vehicles are generally very low. However, N2O is a powerful greenhouse gas, and small emissions of N2O can contribute substantially to total GHG inventories. Two fleets of different vehicle models, both meeting the current US Tier 1 emission standard, were evaluated in an effort to develop a better understanding of N2O emissions from modern three-way catalyst-equipped vehicles. Nine 1997 Ford Crown Victoria vehicles operating on clean-burning US Federal Phase 2 Reformulated Gasolines were assessed over 60,000 miles. For additional comparison, testing was also conducted with catalysts from six 1994 Toyota Camry vehicles, which had previously undergone 110,000 miles of controlled mileage accumulation.

The Clean Air Act of 1990 requires on-board diagnostics (OED) capabilities on all new vehicles. These diagnostic systems monitor the performance of engine and emission system components and inform the vehicle operator when component or system degradation could significantly impact emissions. Acceptable operation of the monitor requires proper treatment of system variables. Fuel composition is one of many possible variables that must be considered for monitoring components directly in the exhaust stream. Recently, the octane enhancing, emissions reducing additive methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) was reintroduced into unleaded gasoline in the U.S. Prior to reintroduction, the additive underwent extensive testing to demonstrate that use of MMT does not adversely affect vehicle emissions or the operation of emission systems such as OBD. However, questions have been raised about the influence of the additive on OBD systems.

Extensive vehicle fleet testing has demonstrated that use of MMT can reduce net tailpipe out emissions. The use of fuel containing the octane-enhancing, emission-reducing fuel additive leads to manganese oxide deposits in the vehicle exhaust system. Studies of the physical and chemical effects of manganese oxide deposits on the performance of catalytic converters conclusively demonstrated that MMT does not adversely affect catalytic converters and, in fact, protected the converters from phosphorus and zinc. Despite the overwhelming evidence that MMT is compatible with catalytic converters and vehicle emission control systems, concerns have recently been raised about the effect of manganese oxides on OBD-II catalytic converter monitoring.

Manganese oxide deposits which are exclusively in the form of Mn3O4, a benign form of manganese, are introduced in the exhaust stream from use of MMT, an octane-enhancing, emission-reducing fuel additive. The physical and chemical effect of these deposits on catalytic converters has generated some controversy in the literature. In this paper, we will focus on the effects that manganese oxide deposits have on catalytic converters. The physical effect of these deposits on the morphology of the converters was investigated by B.E.T surface area measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and x-ray fluorescence (XRF). The chemical effect was investigated with tests using both slave-engine dynamometers and a pulse-flame combustor to probe for differences in catalyst performance. Data from an extensive vehicle fleet which was tested according to a program designed in consultation with the EPA and the automobile industry will be presented.