Search Results

Automatic thermal comfort control for the minimum consumables PLSS is undertaken using several control approaches. Accuracy and performance of the strategies using feedforward, feedback, and gain scheduling are evaluated through simulation, highlighting their advantages and limitations. Implementation issues, consumable usage, and the provision for the extension of these control strategies to the cryogenic PLSS are addressed.

A transient model of the Minimum Consumables Portable Life Support System (MPLSS) Advanced Space Suit design has been developed and implemented using MAT-LAB/Simulink. The purpose of the model is to help with sizing and evaluation of the MPLSS design and aid development of an automatic thermal comfort control strategy. The MPLSS model is described, a basic thermal comfort control strategy implemented, and the thermal characteristics of the MPLSS Advanced Space Suit are investigated.

The duration and frequency of extravehicular activity (EVA) is expected to increase with the anticipation of challenging missions ahead. This necessitates the development of an automatic controller for astronaut thermal comfort regulation. A reliable human thermal model is essential in order to predict the thermal response of subjects under various conditions to aid in automatic controller development. This paper examines thermal response sensitivity to several parameters and input modifications using a popular human thermal model. These parameter and input variations are based either on values reported in the literature or realistic estimates.

The prospect of using automatic control for astronaut thermal comfort regulation during extravehicular activity (EVA) requires an investigation of issues concerning the current state of the art of human thermal models. The analysis presented includes, but is not limited to, the discussion of assumptions and the accuracy, range and relative significance of parameters (e.g., thermal properties, physical dimensions, etc.) of transient human thermal models. The Wissler 1D model attracts primary consideration; however, there exists the appropriate inclusion of the 41-Node Man model for reflection and study.

A detailed comparison has begun of the structure and function of two human thermal models, the 41-Node Man model and the Wissler model, being considered for use in a proposed simulation test bed to model the fully transient extravehicular activity (EVA) automatic thermal control problem. The evaluation is directed toward demonstrating the current state of the art in human thermal modeling methodology and performance. Internal formulative differences between the models is the primary focus.