Search Results

Life cycle benefits of a chrome-free sealing wash were evaluated. Material consumption, disposal costs, water pretreatment, waste water treatment and product performance were used to compare a chrome-free product to traditional washes. Acquisition costs and vehicle weight impacts were also considered. The direction of domestic and international regulatory initiatives will play a significant part in the application of this study=s findings. The paper discusses the factors and decision process that led to the trial of chrome free rinse in a vehicle assembly plant and the results of this test. Durability testing was performed with current and evolving primer systems. Equivalent durability was shown with multiple supplier/multiple primer process combinations. The study indicated that chrome-free sealing wash would yield a small cost savings and a minor reduction in weight with equal performance to the current chrome containing process.

A selection of commercially available chromium and chromium-free post phosphate rinses along with a deionized water rinse were evaluated over several zinc and zinc-alloy coated sheet steels. The test specimens were pretreated and electrocoated on-line in an automotive assembly plant. The effect of the rinse treatments on the cosmetic corrosion performance of the substrates, after 5 years of exposure in an outdoor scab corrosion test was determined. After this exposure none of the rinse treatments had performed better than deionized water rinse on zinc and zinc-iron coated sheet. The zinc-nickel coating showed improved scribe creepage when treated with the Cr+6/Cr+3 rinse. Data is provided comparing the concentration of the treatments used vs scribe creepage and chipping corrosion paint loss.

A comprehensive selection of automotive sheet steels were exposed in an outdoor scab corrosion test to provide a base-line of cosmetic corrosion performance. Eighteen different coated sheet steels along with CRS as a control were processed using two commercially available zinc phosphate chemistries. The phosphating was done using both immersion and spray phosphate processes in a laboratory and an automotive assembly plant. Scribe creepage results are reported for 5 years outdoor scab exposure. Comparisons of the scribe creepage behavior of CRS, zinc, and zinc alloy coatings and the effect of the phosphate treatment are provided. An estimate of 10 years field performance is made.

A representative selection of commercially available zinc phosphate pretreatments were evaluated over four sheet metal substrates. The intent of the study was to compare cosmetic corrosion resistance and paint adhesion performance of the various sheet metal/phosphate combinations under present cathodic electrocoat and topcoat systems. While laboratory applied pretreatments were used, an attempt was made to duplicate deficient conditions on some specimens by eliminating rinse conditioner and/or chromium rinse. Panels were tested using the High Temperature Chipping Corrosion and Accelerated Outdoor Corrosion cycles. The resulting creepback from scribe and paint loss data were analyzed and used to draw conclusions regarding relative performances of rinse conditions, phosphates and substrates.