Search Results

The OBD II and EOBD legislation have significantly increased the number of system components that have to be monitored in order to avoid emissions degradation. Consequently, the algorithm design and the related calibration effort is becoming more and more challenging. Because of decreasing OBD thresholds, the monitoring strategy accuracy, which is tightly related with the components tolerances and the calibration quality, has to be improved. A model-based offline simulation of the monitoring strategies allows consideration of component and sensor tolerances as well as a first calibration optimization in the early development phase. AVL applied and improved a methodology that takes into account this information, which would require a big effort using testbed or vehicle measurements. In many cases a component influence analysis is possible before hardware is available for testbed measurements.

Worldwide OBD legislation has and will be tightened drastically. In the US, OBD II for PC and the introduction of HD OBD for HD vehicles in 2010 will be the next steps. Further challenges have come up with the introduction of active exhaust gas aftertreatment components to meet the lower future emission standards, especially with the implementation of combined DPF-De-NOx-systems for PC and HD engines. Following such an increase in complexity, more comprehensive algorithms and software have to be developed to cope with the legislative requirements for exhaust gas aftertreatment devices. The calibration has to assure the proper functionality of OBD under all driving situations and ambient conditions. The increased complexity can only be mastered when new and efficient tools and methodologies are applied for both algorithm design and calibration. Consequently, OBD requirements have to be taken into account right from the start of engine development.

The ever increasing complexity of engine control systems demands upon the application of new tools and methodologies. For the online optimisation of diesel engines on test beds a number of aspects have to be considered and optimised in parallel to achieve the best compromise for emissions, performance, NVH, etc. For this complex development process Design of Experiments (DoE) is only a first step to be performed. By its implementation into the test bed software the complex process can be effectively handled online. Additional software tools are combined in this development process to exploit the entire potential of HSDI engine control systems with the additional benefit of reducing in parallel the engine development time. Examples of a successful application of these methodologies in series development projects and the results hence achieved are presented.