Search Results

Historically, vehicle fluid condition has been monitored by measuring miles driven or hours operated. Many current vehicles have more sophisticated monitoring methods that use additional variables such as fuel consumption, engine temperature and engine revolutions to predict fluid condition. None of these monitoring means, however, actually measures a fluid property to determine condition, and that is about to change. New sensors and diagnostic systems are being developed that allow real time measurement of some lubricant physical and/or chemical properties and interpret the results in order to recommend oil change intervals and maximize performance. Many of these new sensors use electrochemical or acoustic wave technologies. This paper examines the use of these two technologies to determine engine oil condition and focuses on the effects of lubricant chemistry on interpreting the results.

Lubricating oil viscosity is commonly measured by the kinematic method as outlined in ASTM 0445. This method is also used to measure drain oil viscosity as an indicator of soot induced thickening. Drain oils can contain solid particles and exhibit non-Newtonian flow behavior. This paper discusses the use of rotational rheometers to measure the rheology of drain oils. These instruments have been used for many years in other industries (food, paints and coatings) to measure particle filled, non- Newtonian fluids. The rotational method yields the general flow curve of viscosity versus shear rate as compared to the single point, low shear kinematic viscosity measurement. The rotational method includes the kinematic viscosity single point but also yields significantly more information on shear behavior. Both pumpability (low shear) and flowability(higher shear) can be ascertained from the rotational method.