Search Results

Individual hydrocarbon conversion efficiencies of engine-out emissions have been measured for four different catalyst formulations (Pd-only, trimetallic, Pd/Rh, and Pt/Rh) during stoichiometric and rich operation. The measurements were carried out as a function of fuel-air equivalence ratio (Φ) using a dynamometer-controlled 1993 Ford V8 engine and capillary gas chromatography. HC conversion efficiency was examined in terms of mass conversion efficiency and also using three new definitions of catalyst conversion efficiency. The efficiencies across the four catalysts show similar trends with Φ for almost all HC species. The catalyst efficiencies for alkanes, alkenes, and aromatic species decrease as Φ increases above stoichiometric: alkane efficiencies decrease faster than alkenes which in turn decrease faster than aromatics. All efficiencies fall to zero near Φ = 1.08 except those of MTBE and acetylene, which remain near 100%.

A single-cylinder, two-valve engine was operated with independent cooling circuits for the engine block and cylinder head to investigate the effect of temperature distribution on HC emissions. The goal was to understand and quantify the mechanisms responsible for decreased HC emissions at elevated temperatures. Tests were run at a typical road load condition using two different fuels (a 97 RON blend and isopentane - to eliminate liquid fuel and oil layer absorption effects). The total HC emissions (97 RON fuel) decreased by 15-20% with an increase in either the cylinder head or engine block coolant temperature from 71 to 110 °C. When operating with isopentane the HC emissions decreased by 15-20% with an increase in the engine block temperature from 71 to 110 °C but were essentially unaffected by cylinder head temperature. This indicates that the cylinder head temperature primarily influenced the HC emissions from liquid fuel effects.

New regulations from the state of California have established, for the first time, reactivity-based exhaust emissions standards for new vehicles and require that any clean alternative fuels needed by these vehicles be made available. Contained in these regulations are provisions for “reactivity adjustment factors” which will provide credit for vehicles which run on reformulated gasoline. The question arises: given two fuels of different chemical composition, but both meeting the criteria for CA Phase 2 gasoline (reformulated gasoline), how different might the specific reactivity of the exhaust hydrocarbons be? In this study we explored this question by examining the engine-out HC emissions from a single-cylinder version of the 5.4 L modular truck engine run on two different CA Phase 2 fuels.

Design and development of an electrohydraulically actuated gas sampling valve is presented for use in auto engine combustion studies. The valve was developed with particular emphasis on sampling within the vicinity of the wall quench layer, requiring minimum leakage rates to avoid sample contamination and flush seating of the valve-stem to valve-seat to avoid perturbations of the wall layer. Response in the range of 0.4 to 1.0 milliseconds is attainable for variable valve lifts measured between 0.01 to 0.30 mm while using a net sealing force of approximately 750N. Gas leakage rates ranged from 0.05% to 1% of the sample mass flow rate when sampling from estimated distances from the wall of 0.3 mm to 0.03 mm, respectively, at a cylinder pressure of 10 bar. The gas sampling valve is presently coupled to a gas chromatograph to measure concentrations of major species components.