Search Results

In the acoustic design of flow guiding components, novel simulation concepts for predicting relevant sound sources in the early design state become increasingly important. This requires accurate numerical methods to describe the involved phenomena. The present study computationally investigates the flow-induced aeroacoustic sound sources, generated in turbulent pipe flow. The analysis follows a hybrid approach, where the acoustic sound field is predicted separately from the underlying turbulent flow field, supplied with acoustic source terms from an incompressible flow simulation of the considered configuration in the limit of low Mach number. Source terms for use as input into different acoustic wave equations, the Lighthill wave equation, the vortex sound theory, and the Perturbed Convective Wave Equation (PCWE) are computed performing incompressible Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) and Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) of fully developed pipe flow.

The absence of combustion engine noise pushes increasingly attention to the sound generation from other, even much weaker, sources in the acoustic design of electric vehicles. The present work focusses on the numerical computation of flow induced noise, typically emerging in components of flow guiding devices in electro-mobile applications. The method of Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) represents a powerful technique for capturing most part of the turbulent fluctuating motion, which qualifies this approach as a highly reliable candidate for providing a sufficiently accurate level of description of the flow induced generation of sound. Considering the generic test configuration of turbulent pipe flow, the present study investigates in particular the scope and the limits of incompressible Large-Eddy Simulation in predicting the evolution of turbulent sound sources to be supplied as source terms into the acoustic analogy of Lighthill.

Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations of heat transfer involving wall bounded flows at elevated Prandtl numbers typically suffer from a lack of accuracy and/or increased mesh dependency. This can be often attributed to an improper near-wall turbulence modeling and the deficiency of the wall heat transfer models (based on the so called P-functions) that do not properly account for the variation of the turbulent Prandtl number in the wall proximity (y+< 5). As the conductive sub-layer gets significantly thinner than the viscous velocity sub-layer (for Pr >1), treatment of the thermal buffer layer gains importance as well. Various hybrid strategies utilize blending functions dependent on the molecular Prandtl number, which do not necessarily provide a smooth transition from the viscous/conductive sub-layer to the logarithmic region.