Search Results

A reliable environment perception is a requirement for safe automated driving. For evaluating and demonstrating the reliability of the vehicle’s environment perception, field tests offer testing conditions that come closest to the vehicle’s driving environment. However, establishing a reference ground truth in field tests is time-consuming. This motivates the development of a procedure for learning the vehicle’s perception reliability from fleet data without the need for a ground truth, which would allow learning the perception reliability from fleet data. In Berk et al. (2019), a method based on Bayesian inference to determine the perception reliability of individual sensors without the need for a ground truth was proposed. The model utilizes the redundancy of sensors to learn the sensor’s perception reliability. The method was tested with simulated data.

The performance of environment perceiving sensors such as e.g. lidar, radar, camera and ultrasonic sensors is safety critical for automated driving vehicles. Therefore, one has to assess the sensors’ performance to assure the automated driving system’s safety. The performance of these sensors is however to some degree sensitive towards adverse weather conditions. A challenge is to quantify the effect of adverse weather conditions on the sensor’s performance early in the development of an automated driving system. This challenge is addressed in this work for lidar sensors. The lidar equation was previously employed in this context to derive estimates of a lidar’s maximum range in different weather conditions. In this work, we present a stochastic simulation framework based on a probabilistic extension of the lidar equation, to quantify the effect of adverse rainfall conditions on a lidar’s raw detection performance.

With increasing levels of driving automation, the perception provided by automotive environment sensors becomes highly safety relevant. A correct assessment of the sensors’ perception reliability is therefore crucial for ensuring the safety of the automated driving functionalities. There are currently no standardized procedures or guidelines for demonstrating the perception reliability of the sensors. Engineers therefore face the challenge of setting up test procedures and plan test drive efforts. Null Hypothesis Significance Testing has been employed previously to answer this question. In this contribution, we present an alternative method based on Bayesian parameter inference, which is easy to implement and whose interpretation is more intuitive for engineers without a profound statistical education. We show how to account for different environmental conditions with an influence on sensor performance and for statistical dependence among perception errors.