Search Results

Vibration shaker testing is a great tool of validating the vibration fatigue performance of automotive components & systems. However, the representative vibration schedule requires a pre-knowledge of the acceleration history for the test object, which usually is not available until the later development phase of a vehicle program when physical properties are available. Sometimes, a generic vibration schedule developed from the worst-case loading profiles are used with risk of lacking correlation with later full vehicle durability test such as Road Test Simulator (RTS) or Proving Ground (PG) road test due to the higher loading amplitude. This paper proposes a virtual accelerometer approach to collect acceleration responses of a component from a virtual vehicle model. First, a multiple body dynamic model will be produced for virtual load calculation over a series of digitalized virtual proving ground road profiles.

As an automobile is driven, its components and structures consistently experience the random excitations from road inputs and periodic vibration from engine firing. This could cause durability issues if the component structure isn’t fully validated. Vibration fatigue is a field of study regarding the assessment and improvement of a component’s or system’s robustness to vibration inputs. This paper introduces aspects of vibration fatigue to help designers, release engineers, and test engineers better understand the requirements, testing methodologies available, and strategies for improving vibration fatigue performance for the design and validation testing of their products. Vibration characteristics such as typical vibration levels and frequency content for varied areas in the automotive environment are introduced. Methodologies available for conducting actual vibration testing are introduced with listed advantages and disadvantages.

Several popular frequency-based fatigue damage models (Wirsching and Light, Ortiz and Chen, Larsen and Lutes, Benascuitti and Tovo, Benascuitti and Tovo with α.75, Dirlik, Zhao and Baker, and Lalanne) are reviewed and assessed. Seventy power spectrum densities with varied amplitude, shape, and irregularity factors from Dirlik’s dissertation are used to study the accuracies of these methods. Recommendations on how to set up the inverse fast Fourier transform to synthesize load data and obtain accurate rainflow cycle counts are given. Since Dirlik’s method is the most commonly used one in industry, a comprehensive investigation of parameter setups for Dirlik’s method is presented. The mean error and standard deviation of the error between the frequency-based model and the rainflow cycle counting method was computed for fatigue slope exponent m ranging from 3 to 12.