Search Results

In 2016, Virtual Reality (VR) equipment entered the mainstream scientific, medical, and entertainment industries. It became both affordable and available to the public market in the form of some of the technologies earliest successful headset: the Oculus Rift™ and HTC Vive™. While new equipment continues to emerge, at the time these headsets came equipped with a 100° field of view screen that allows a viewer a seamless 360° environment to experience that is non-linear in the sense that the viewer can chose where they look and for how long. The fundamental differences, however, between the conventional form of visualizations like computer animations and graphics and VR are subtle. A VR environment can be understood as a series of two-dimensional images, stitched together to be a seamless single 360° image. In this respect, it is only the number of images the viewer sees at one time that separates a conventional visualization from a VR experience.

There are numerous publically available smart phone applications designed to track the speed and position of the user. By accessing the phones built in GPS receivers, these applications record the position over time of the phone and report the record on the phone itself, and typically on the application’s website. These applications range in cost from free to a few dollars, with some, that advertise greater functionality, costing significantly higher. This paper examines the reliability of the data reported through these applications, and the potential for these applications to be useful in certain conditions where monitoring and recording vehicle or pedestrian movement is needed. To analyze the reliability of the applications, three of the more popular and widely used tracking programs were downloaded to three different smart phones to represent a good spectrum of operating platforms.