Search Results

Combustion phasing of Spark Ignition (SI) engines is traditionally regulated with map-based spark timing (SPKT) control. The calibration time and effort of this feed forward SPKT control strategy becomes less favorable as the number of engine control actuators increases. This paper proposes a model based combustion phasing control frame work. The feed forward control law is obtained by real time numerical optimization utilizing a high-fidelity combustion model that is based on flame entrainment theory. An optimization routine identifies the SPKT which phases the combustion close to the target without violating combustion constraints of knock and excessive cycle-by-cycle covariance of indicated mean effective pressure (COV of IMEP). Cylinder pressure sensors are utilized to enable feedback control of combustion phasing. An Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is applied to reject sensor noise and combustion variation from the cylinder pressure signal.

As engines are equipped with an increased number of control actuators to meet fuel economy targets they become more difficult to control and calibrate. The large number of control actuators encourages the investigation of physics-based control strategies to reduce calibration time and complexity. Of particular interest is spark timing control and calibration since it has a significant influence on engine efficiency, emissions, vibration and durability. Spark timing determination to achieve a desired combustion phasing is currently an empirical process that occurs during the calibration phase of engine development. This process utilizes a large number of stored surfaces and corrections to account for the wide range of operating environments and conditions that a given engine will experience. An obstacle to realizing feedforward physics-based combustion phasing control is the requirement for an accurate and fast combustion model.

The highly transient operational nature of passenger car engines makes cylinder pressure based feedback control of combustion phasing difficult. The problem is further complicated by cycle-to-cycle combustion variation. A method for fast and accurate differentiation of normal combustion variations and true changes in combustion phasing is addressed in this research. The proposed method combines the results of a feed forward combustion phasing prediction model and “noisy” measurements from cylinder pressure using an iterative estimation technique. A modified version of an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is applied to calculate optimal estimation gain according to the stochastic properties of the combustion phasing measurement at the corresponding engine operating condition. Methods to improve steady state CA50 estimation performance and adaptation to errors are further discussed in this research.

As engines are equipped with an increased number of control actuators to meet fuel economy targets, they become more difficult to control and calibrate. The additional complexity created by a larger number of control actuators motivates the use of physics-based control strategies to reduce calibration time and complexity. Combustion phasing, as one of the most important engine combustion metrics, has a significant influence on engine efficiency, emissions, vibration and durability. To realize physics-based engine combustion phasing control, an accurate prediction model is required. This research introduces physics-based control-oriented laminar flame speed and turbulence intensity models that can be used in a quasi-dimensional turbulent entrainment combustion model. The influence of laminar flame speed and turbulence intensity on predicted mass fraction burned (MFB) profile during combustion is analyzed.

To improve fuel economy and reduce regulated emissions spark-ignition engines are equipped with a large number of control actuators, motivating the use of model-based ignition timing prediction strategies. Model-based ignition timing strategies require a target combustion phasing for proper calibration, generally defined by the crank angle location where fifty percent of the air/fuel mixture is burned (CA50). When fuel type is altered the target CA50 must be updated in the ‘knock region’ to avoid engine damage while maintaining the highest possible efficiency. This process is particularly important when switching between gasoline and E85 because they have vastly different octane ratings. A semi-physical virtual octane sensor, based on an Arrhenius function combined with a quasi-dimensional turbulent flame entrainment combustion model, is described that identifies the size of the knock region for a given fuel.

Map-based ignition timing control and calibration routines become cumbersome when the number of control degrees of freedom increases and/or a wide range of fuels are used, motivating the use of model-based methods. Purely physics based control techniques can decrease calibration burdens, but require high complexity to capture non-linear engine behavior with low computational requirements. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), on the other hand, have been recognized as a powerful tool for modeling systems which exhibit nonlinear relationships, but they lack physical significance. Combining these two techniques to produce semi-physical artificial neural network models that can provide high accuracy and low computational intensity is the focus of this research. Physical input parameters are selected based on their sensitivity to combustion duration prediction accuracy.