Search Results

Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) are considered as the most commercial prospects new energy vehicles. Most HEVs have adopted Atkinson cycle engine as the main drive power. Atkinson cycle engine uses late intake valve closing (LIVC) to reduce pumping losses and compression work in part load operation. It can transform more heat energy to mechanical energy, improve engine thermal efficiency and decrease fuel consumption. In this paper, the investigations of Atkinson cycle converted from conventional Otto cycle gasoline engine have been carried out. First of all, high geometry compression ratio (CR) has been optimized through piston redesign from 10.5 to 13 in order to overcome the intrinsic drawback of Atkinson cycle in that combustion performance deteriorates due to the decline in the effective CR. Then, both intake and exhaust cam profile have been redesigned to meet the requirements of Atkinson cycle engine.

Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) consumes approx. 2/3 of the oil in the word and 30-40% of the fuel combustion energy in an ICE is wasted in the form of thermal energy in the exhaust gas stream. Exhaust gas thermal energy recovery demonstrates a great potential for overall system thermal efficiency improvements and fuel saving. In this paper different exhaust gas energy recovery bottoming cycles have been analyzed and discussed based on fundamental thermodynamics theory. The typical bottoming cycles are classified into two categories: i.e. direct and indirect energy recovery bottoming cycles. New terms, i.e. Energy Recovery Efficiency (ERE), Energy Conversion Efficiency (ECE) and Overall Energy Conversion Efficiency (OECE) are proposed for the purposes of easier to analyze and easier to compare among the various bottoming cycles. Simplified formulas are derived to demonstrate the key design and operating parameters which define or limit the energy recovery potential.

In engine radiated noise analysis, the conventional boundary element method (BEM) is unsuitable for conducting large-scale acoustic simulations because of low calculation efficiency. The Fast Multipole boundary element method (FMBEM), although greatly improved calculation efficiency for large-scale acoustic simulations, has the problem of low efficiency at the low frequency region and low accuracy at the high frequency region. Those methods cannot meet the requirements of design engineers to get the results in a couple of days. In order to solve the powertrain radiated noise problems accurately and efficiently, some simplified methods and scripts were developed in big-three auto makers and suppliers, such as DIRA. Those scripts are very fast and can meet the timing requirement, but generally, without clear physical meaning.