Search Results

In electric vehicles, the powertrain mounting system design has challenges different from conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) powertrains. Due to the absence of source noise, the customer predominantly experiences the buzz, squeak and rattle (BSR) noise. The 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) modal frequency target is less stringent than a three-cylinder or four-cylinder ICE powertrain. The durability loads in EV also differ due to less powertrain weight. In this paper, a study has been carried out about balancing all three main performance parameters of modal decoupling, BSR and durability through powertrain mount design optimization. The article shows that a carryover ICE powertrain mount has typical issues in Electric Vehicle (EV). A case study has discussed in detail how to manage those issues. Finally, it is concluded that a particular focus is required during an early stage of mount design to address these challenges for an EV.

For a modified electric vehicle on the same internal combustion engine (ICE) platform, the primary consideration is to have no change in long member and pendulum type conventional engine mounting system to save development cost and timeline. Electric vehicle (EV) powertrain is comparatively lighter w.r.t the ICE. As a result, the engine mount’s static preload setting point or powertrain centre of gravity under static powertrain load gets changed resulting in a change in stiffness for the same engine mount. As the static stiffness changes, the dynamic stiffness and modal frequency also change. The 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) modal frequency has almost no impact on powertrain modes as EV powertrain modes, mainly, the motor frequency, is much higher than engine mount Eigen modes. In this scenario, the gap management gets disturbed due to less static preload, and non-linearity gets affected.

BSR noise is an important parameters for customer discomfort. According to a market survey, squeaks and rattles are the third most important customer concern in cars after six months of ownership. The high quality acoustic environment of a car, annoying noises like buzz, squeak, and rattle is related to various parameters such as material assembly, tolerance, aging, humidity, surface contact, and surface hardness. BSR is originated from frictional movement between two parts or from the impact between two parts. The rattle noise is caused when surfaces close to each other move perpendicular to each other due to insufficient attachments or insufficient structural strength. In our study, we have shown the impact of various front suspension component in front suspension assembly on BSR noise and also the method to detect and attenuate the same. A methodical analysis process is shown to identify the contributing part and resolve the BSR issue.

This paper deals with specific NVH related issues attributed due to LCA bush stiffness and Brake rotor DTV. While the focus is on the cause of such vibration (judder while braking at 120 kmph), the presentation goes to the root-cause of judder and how various suspension/tire/brake components contribute to the generation/amplification of such vibration. Results are presented for twist blade types of vehicle suspensions, along with procedures that were developed specifically for this study and some of the actual case study. DTV-Disk thickness variation

Today, reducing the vehicle development time is a very crucial task. In the early development stages, the limited time and few vehicle prototypes are available for validation. In such scenarios, durability validation of different design iterations of critical components like engine mounts, with respect to the real road usage is a challenge. Road simulation testing in a laboratory is a reliable approach to fatigue and durability tests for the evaluation of platforms, components and subassemblies. Durability evaluation of engine mount is, generally, performed either at assembly level, using multi-axial road simulation approach or at component level, using uniaxial sinusoidal load testing. The new testing approach here allows testing of engine mounts at component level using road simulation approach by applying multi-axial loads or deflections as per the real road usage conditions.

In the highly competitive global automotive market and with the taste of customer becoming more refined, the need to develop high quality products and achieve product excellence in all areas to obtain market leadership is critical. Buzz, squeak and rattle (BSR) is the automotive industry term for the audible engineering challenges faced by all vehicle and component engineers. Minimizing BSR is of paramount importance when designing vehicle components and whole vehicle assemblies. Focus on BSR issues for an automobile interior component design have rapidly increased due to customer’s expectation for high quality vehicles. Also, due to advances in the reduction of vehicle interior and exterior noise, engine mounts have recently been brought to the forefront to meet the vehicle interior sound level targets. Engine mounts serve two principal functions in a vehicle, vibration isolation and engine support.

Normal engine mounting system is designed to carry loads of powertrain in all driving conditions and also isolate the vibrations of powertrain. Softer mounts are good for vibration isolation but it is not recommended to have softer mounts because durability will be affected adversely. Optimum stiffness needs to be finalized which will have balance between durability and performance. In addition to durability many performance parameters needs to be checked during the time of development. This study includes the development of engine mounting system for elimination of drive away judder in first gear. Maximum peak torque value for the drive-away event is in the range of 80Nm - 120Nm. In the worst case, this peak torque can reach to maximum 170Nm depending on maneuver, engine rpm is around 1100-1200. Steering wheel, instrument panel and whole vehicle cabin will vibrate for few seconds and then vehicle will run smoothly.

Engine mounting system maintains the position of powertrain in the vehicle with respect to chassis and other accessories during inertia, torque reaction loads and roadway disturbances. The mounting system also plays a role in terms of isolation of the rest of the vehicle and its occupants from powertrain and helps in maintaining vehicle ride and handling condition. This paper investigates the performance comparison between hydromount and switchable hydromount during idle and ride performance. The optimization scheme aims to improve the performance of the mounting system in order to achieve overall powertrain performance and NVH attribute balancing through switchable mount technology.

In this study we will be discussing two issues related to vibrations which effect car owners. The first one, called lateral shake, can be described as a lateral vibration felt by customer in low speed of around 1200rpm, when vehicle shakes severely in Y-direction. The vibration is significantly felt at the thighs of passengers. A 16DOF rigid body model is established to simulate the power train & body system. The second vibration issue, called drive away shudder (also known as clutch judder/chatter/shudder) is a vibration felt by customers at the time of marching off. The vibration is significantly felt at the time of clutch engagement as a shiver in vehicle. While the common solution of shudder is to optimize clutch friction & engagement, in this study solution has been provided by optimizing the power train mounting system. Clutch shudder is observed on a medium sized car when driven in the range of 10-20 Km/h.

The growing demand of fuel and cost saving on vehicle, today’s vehicle manufacturer are working on various weight reduction initiative in EV. Lighter weight vehicle have bigger challenges to meet NVH requirement. There are two types of EV called modified and adopted EV’s are commonly in use. The sub frame type of EV system comes under the category of modified EV. In this paper, a mounting system is studied and compared for a cradle type EV as well as sub frame or saddle type EV. MATLAB based optimization tools are used for parameter optimization. The focus is put on the optimization of mounting system location and stiffness for energy optimization, CoG and TRA-EA optimization. The best engine mounting system is compared and adopted based on simulation. 12 DOF studied to address high frequency resonance issues for a sub frame type EV. Finally robustness of the system is checked based on various simulation and optimization.

If we see from the past and now competition in automotive industry increased tremendously and every car manufacturer are bringing up there innovations into the market and giving a lot of options to the customers to choose and the customer experience as well as satisfaction has become one of the main driver of success for the company. In today’s world of automotive design virtual analysis is playing a crucial role in the design and development. There are software’s that are available in market to simulate practical conditions digitally. Here we are mainly focused on effect of change in engine mount stiffness on acceleration at driver seat rail point using ADAMS. Which facilitates reduction of design of experiments and finalizing optimized stiffness values for engine mounts for engine idle vibration refinement point of view. ADAMS is mechanical system analysis software where we can simulate the dynamic behavior and distribution of loads throughout the system.

There are two types of EV (electric vehicle) currently in use, namely modified EV and dedicated EV. Generally, we use a modified EV in cost-sensitive markets where we can commonize platform between internal combustion engine (ICE) and EV vehicles. For modified EV, we use the cradle to support the powertrain components, which connects to the engine mount, which in turn attaches to extended members and subframe. The fabricated cradle has many welding components that cause dimensional variation at the rear-mount attachment point on gearbox, which creates a reduction in the dynamic envelops significantly. The decrease in clearance often results in BSR noise, which we have simulated in the rig as well as on rope track. On a rough road, this noise is predominant. This buzz, squeak and rattle (BSR) noise also results in Tip in/Tip out noise, which is quite uncomfortable for the customer during sudden acceleration and deceleration.

As we are moving towards complete electrification from combustion engine to electric motor, the system design approach also changes due to application. For a range of 100-150 kg EV powertrain weight, number of mounts as well as mount locations, orientations and stiffnesses plays a significant role during system design. The electric powertrains are usually lighter and their mounts are usually stiffer than the mounts for typical combustion engines, the static displacements at dead load are usually lower. However, currently it seems like there is no common direction of all OEM’s regarding the question of how stiff an e-motor mounting system should actually be. Due to the high torque of the EV’s one could even think about switching to a four point mounting instead of a pendulum mounting.

Today, noise perceived by the occupants is becoming an important factor driving the design standards for the design of most of the interior assemblies in an automotive vehicle. Buzz, Squeak and Rattle (BSR) is a major contributor towards the perceived noise of annoyance to the vehicle occupants. An automotive vehicle consists of many chassis assemblies which are the potential sources of BSR noise. The potential locations of critical BSR noise could be contained within such assemblies as well as across their boundaries. Engine mount design is major area where BSR noises can be heard inside cabin on various road conditions. Natural rubber is regular rubber used in engine mount applications but in this paper BSR problems are solved by changing the rubber compound i.e., NR+BR (slippery compound). Detailed case study is presented where slippery rubber compound is used which is solving BSR issue and also meeting durability targets.

Key on/off Vibrations plays an important role in the quality of NVH on a vehicle. Hence having a good KOKO in the vehicle is desirable by every OEM. The vibration transfer to the vehicle can be refined by either reducing the source vibrations or improving isolation. In this study, critical factors affecting KOKO vibration has been identified. Focus has been given on improving the KOKO by change in mounting system stiffness & stopper gap, and assuming other parameters as constant. The study highlights a new simulation approach using ADAMS View to help run a DOE for solving KOKO issue on vehicle. The contribution of C mount stiffness and stopper gap is shown through simulation results. The correlation between simulation & test results has been established by measuring rigid body modes and KOKO vibration on vehicle for a set of mount configuration. Test results show significant KOKO improvement with the mount configuration optimized through simulation.

Vehicle lateral shake during take-off is sensitively felt by customers when the vehicle is driven at a low speed under drive away acceleration. The take-off shudder is complained by customers during 1st and 2nd gear take off. Under an engine torque and half shaft angle, the drive-away shudder usually occurs during acceleration to a specific low speed at 1200 to 1600 engine rpm, which makes the vehicle shake severely. A thorough investigation with possible design optimization of mounting system, drive shaft joint and lubrication is done to reduce the lateral vibration. This paper focuses on a passenger car, the take-off shudder of which occurs at a speed between 20 km/h and 30 km/h. The test vehicle is a monocoque construction with front wheel drive east west engine. Vehicle lateral shake is observed during the low gear power train run up in Wide Open Throttle (WOT) condition.

Due to the recent trend in auto industry to opt for higher power engines, causes increase in vibrations levels in the passenger’s compartment. This requires a better and comprehensive model to analyze vibrations from engine to seat and steering wheel much before the proto stage of development in the design stage itself. For this purpose, modelling is done in ADAMS multi dynamics and assuming the 16 degrees of freedom of the vehicle. Further, a crank drive model is developed to simulate engine excitation forces comprising unbalanced inertia forces and torque fluctuations and their effects seat rail and steering wheel vibration is derived. This tool is an attempt to predict such vibrations caused and assist in design enhancement and streamline the procedure.

In an electric vehicle, internal combustion engines are replaced by the electric motor. As a result, the signature of source vibration changes. The noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) issues are entirely different in electric vehicle (EV) compared to internal combustion engine (ICE) due to the change in source vibration. The outline of this paper is a comparative study of source vibration, the challenges to address various noise issues related to source vibration and the isolation methodology. A case study is presented to show the different methods of treatment required to mitigate source vibration issues during the electric vehicle development program. Keywords: Engine, Motor, vibration

Electric motor mounts resonate at high frequency in the range of 600 to 1000Hz with motor excitation frequency resulting in isolation performance deterioration. There is a selection process of motor mounts such that the force-transfer under transient torque reduced and also avoids high-frequency resonance. The rubber dynamic stiffness plays a significant role in excitation frequency. Rubber shape factor and compound directly contribute towards the dynamic stiffness properties of the mount. Isolation efficiency depends on force transfer to the body and resonance phenomenon. In this paper, the rubber shape of motor mounts, which affect progression characteristics as well as high-frequency resonance, is discussed. The wings-effect of rubber bushes discussed which can be tuned to get the desired frequency shift in order to avoid resonance.

Electric vehicles (EV’s) are very much noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) sensitive due to the absence of engine noise. The outline of this paper is based on vehicle level turning noise evaluation. The impact of the driveshaft angle in the frequency range of 1000-2000Hz. The level of noise while turning at driver and co-driver side is evaluated first. Then the possible countermeasure to address such noise issues are also discussed. The impact on the angular adjusted roller (AAR) joint and driveshaft angle is studied along with the impact on other parameters like powertrain mount stiffness, ground clearance and vehicle architecture.