Search Results

A test procedure was developed to assess the deposit-forming tendencies of gasoline/ethanol fuel blends, ranging from 0 % to 100 % ethanol (E0 to E100). The test engine was a Ford 1.8l - 4 cylinder -16 valve -natural aspirated flex fuel engine, which is used in various vehicle models, such as the European Focus and C-MAX. The test cycle, a realistic engine speed/torque profile, based on an urban driving pattern, provided good differentiation between different gasoline/ethanol fuel blends as well as between additized and non-additized fuel blends. With unadditized E85 critical deposits were found in the intake system, on the intake valves, in the combustion chamber and on the injector tips. Well known deposit control additives (DCA) used in gasoline such as PIBA (polyisobutyleneamine) and PEA (polyetheramine) were examined in E85 for deposit control effectiveness of intake valves, injectors and combustion chambers.

An investigative group set up under the auspices of the CEC (Coordinating European Council) collected data on combustion chamber deposits (CCD), ASTM unwashed gum (UWG) results and the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of these gums for different fuels from many different sources. The analysis of this data shows that UWG cannot and does not predict CCD. It is not possible to use UWG or any aspect of its behaviour in the TGA to assess the CCD-forming tendency of randomly chosen fuels.