Search Results

Electric Vehicles are typically thought of as being quiet and refined, but they do come with some unique N&V challenges. Some of these challenges include a natural sound that can be undesirable due to its tonal nature, presence of high frequency, discontinuities in sound, and characteristics and levels that do not always naturally increase with motor torque and vehicle speed. One approach to address those challenges is Electric Vehicle Sound Enhancement (EVSE) which is a software feature embedded within the infotainment system. EVSE can be used to improve the perception of the vehicle by enhancing the preferred natural sounds of the vehicle, masking unusual and annoying components of the sound and aurally conveying information related to the vehicle performance. A jury study was conducted to better understand how EVSE can be used to accomplish this.

Historical metrics intended to drive the development of vehicle powertrains have focused on sounds that are characteristic of IC engines. The interior noise contribution of the propulsion system in electric vehicles has significantly more tonal noise (and much less impulsive and broadband noise) than their IC engine counterparts. This tonal noise is not adequately represented by current propulsion systems metrics. While metrics exist today that were developed to represent the presence of tones in sounds most have focused on the level aspect of the tones relative to the surrounding noise or masking level, some examples include tonality, tone-to-noise ratio, and prominence ratio. A secondary, but also important aspect of tones is the annoyance as a function of frequency. This paper will highlight the development of a tonal annoyance weighting curve that can be used to account for the frequency aspect of tonal annoyance relative to electric vehicles.

During the development of an automotive acoustic package, valuable information can be gained by visualizing the acoustic energy flow through the Front-of-Dash (FOD) when a sound source is placed in the engine compartment. Two of the commonly used methods for generating the visual map of the acoustic field include Sound Intensity measurements and array technologies. An alternative method is to use a tracked 3-dimensional acoustic probe to scan and visualize the FOD in real-time when the sound source is injecting noise into the engine compartment. The scan is used to focus the development of the FOD acoustic package on the weakest areas by identifying acoustic leaks and locations with low Transmission Loss. This paper provides a brief discussion of the capabilities of the tracked 3-D acoustic probe, and presents examples of the implementation of the probe during the development of the FOD acoustic package for two mid-sized sedans.

Binaural recordings are often used for added realism in subjective listening studies, but are commonly played back in environments that are different than those in which the recordings were taken. An important component of the added realism is the ability of the listener to locate the acoustic sources in a three dimensional space. While humans can generally do a good job of locating acoustic sources through inter-aural time differences (ITD) and inter-aural intensity differences (IID), some well documented ambiguities exist when using these acoustic cues by themselves (i.e. ITD and ILD for a source in front of or behind a listener are identical). To resolve these ambiguities, humans often rely on supplemental information from either direct visual feedback or from their knowledge of and comfort with the listening environment.

As an agricultural tractor OEM was moving a new tractor model from development into production, an objectionable cab “boom” was identified that was not present in the preproduction pilot -level tractors. The cab boom was identified as a low frequency tone causing an increase of 7 (dBA) over the level in the pilot tractors, which was deemed unacceptable. The process used by the tractor OEM engineering team to address this problem has been widely used and refined in the automotive industry, but it is relatively new in the agricultural/off-road vehicle industry. This paper describes the source-path-receiver approach that led to identifying the exhaust tip as the source and the vibro-acoustic coupling of a windshield structural mode with an acoustic cab cavity mode as the path of the boom event.

NVH labs at Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers have in the past 15 years implemented testing techniques to validate the NV performance of their products. Validation tests are most often conducted to check compliance of the product to vehicle OEM specifications, less often to truly assess NV performance. Vehicle OEM specifications are sometimes outdated, narrow in scope and require lab-type of conditions, i.e. anechoic or hemi-anechoic environment, fixed microphone position and specific operating conditions. Tier 1 and 2 suppliers often find themselves in a situation in which they have to transport lab tests to the plant floor, as they are requested by their customer to ensure 100% shipped quality. In order to do so, they are faced with several technical and commercial challenges as vehicle OEM specifications often have no provisions for plant-floor boundary conditions and cycle time requirements.

For vehicle Original Equipment Manufactures (OEMs), road noise inside the vehicle is an important aspect that contributes to the comfort and the sound quality image of the vehicle. Road noise inside a vehicle is a function of the source (tire design interacting with road surface) and of vehicle sensitivity functions. Road noise targets and tire targets are typically developed by characterizing the tire as a noise and/or vibration source and by characterizing the vehicle as a matrix of acoustic or structural paths(1). This paper focuses on the development of a simplified procedure for measurement of Noise Reduction (or acoustic vehicle sensitivity function) from tire patch to vehicle interior. Several procedures are available from either literature, vehicle manufacturers or software providers, which exhibit important differences regarding sound production, number and position of source and receiver microphones, or measured parameters (2).