Refine Your Search

Search Results

Author:
Viewing 1 to 4 of 4
Journal Article

Biomechanical Response of the Human Face and Corresponding Biofidelity of the FOCUS Headform

2010-04-12
2010-01-1317
In order to evaluate a human surrogate, the human and surrogate response must be defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of cadaver subjects to blunt impacts to the frontal bone, nasal bone and maxilla. Force-displacement corridors were developed based on the impact response of each region. Variation in the force-displacement response of the cadaver subjects due to the occurrence of fracture and fracture severity was demonstrated. Additionally, impacts were performed at matched locations using the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre Safety (FOCUS) headform. The FOCUS headform is capable of measuring forces imposed onto facial structures using internal load cells. Based on the tests performed in this study, the nasal region of the FOCUS headform was found to be the most sensitive to impact location. Due to a wide range in geometrical characteristics, the nasal impact response varied significantly, resulting in wide corridors for human response.
Journal Article

Simulation Model for Low-Speed Bumper-to-Bumper Crashes

2010-04-12
2010-01-0051
The purpose of this study was to develop a numerical analytical model of collinear low-speed bumper-to-bumper crashes and use the model to perform parametric studies of low-speed crashes and to estimate the severity of low-speed crashes that have already occurred. The model treats the car body as a rigid structure and the bumper as a deformable structure attached to the vehicle. The theory used in the model is based on Newton's Laws. The model uses an Impact Force-Deformation (IF-D) function to determine the impact force for a given amount of crush. The IF-D function used in the simulation of a crash that has already occurred can be theoretical or based on the measured force-deflection characteristics of the bumpers of the vehicles that were involved in the actual crash. The restitution of the bumpers is accounted for in a simulated crash through the rebound characteristics of the bumper system in the IF-D function.
Technical Paper

Evaluation of Thoracic and Lumbar Accelerations of Volunteers in Vertical and Horizontal Loading Scenarios

2010-04-12
2010-01-0146
There are exposures of the body to accelerations in the lumbar and thoracic regions on a regular basis with everyday activities and exercises. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of the thoracic and lumbar regions in human volunteers subjected to vigorous activities. A total of 181 tests include twenty volunteers subjected to four test scenarios: “plopping” down in a seat, a vertical jump, a vertical drop while in a supine position, and a vertical drop while seated upright in a swing. Each of the latter three activities included three severity levels with drop heights ranging from 25 mm to 900 mm. Volunteers selected represent the anthropometry of the general population including males and females at a wide range of weights (54 to 99 kg), heights (150 to 191 cm), and ages (26 to 58 years old). Instrumentation for each volunteer included tri-axial accelerometers attached to custom-fit mounts that were secured around the lumbar and upper thoracic regions.
Technical Paper

An Evaluation of a Fiber Optic Based Sensor for Measuring Chest and Abdominal Deflection

2005-04-11
2005-01-0745
The objective of this study was to investigate the use of a fiber optic based sensor, ShapeTape, as an instrument for measuring abdominal and chest deflection, and to compare it to the current instrument used in impact biomechanics applications, the chestband. Drift, pressure, and temperature tests were conducted for ShapeTape alone, whereas quasi-static and dynamic loading tests were conducted as comparison tests between the chestband and ShapeTape. The effects of drift and temperature on ShapeTape were very small, averaging 0.26% and 1.2% full scale changes respectively. During the pressure test at a load of 1000 N the ShapeTape sensor tested experience a 7.47% full scale voltage change. The average errors in reporting maximum deflection of the chest form during the quasi-static loading tests were 3.35% and 1.64% for ShapeTape and the chestband respectively.
X