Search Results

The increase in the number of electronic control units (ECUs) in the modern vehicle, combined with increased software complexity and more distributed controls has led to an extreme testing challenge when it comes to the verification and validation of body-control ECUs. In general test engineers have to deal with more software configurations, more closed-loop interaction between ECUs, and more fault conditions than ever before. By adding Unified Diagnostic Services (UDS) over CAN to a Hardware-In-The-Loop (HIL) test system, Lear was able to increase test automation and provide wider test coverage by automating the ECU flashing process, adding diagnostic identifiers and trouble codes to their test scripts, and providing a quick and easy way to exercise ECU I/O. Lear chose to implement their HIL testers on the open PXI[1] hardware platform, utilizing National Instruments' VeriStand software framework.

Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation has become standard practice in the verification process of electronic control units (ECUs). However, new system control concepts continue to drive and expand the requirements for HIL systems. In this maturing application space, there is a natural trend towards the use of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) tools and open, multivendor hardware architectures. This open architecture is critical in helping HIL testers meet these requirements in an increasingly cost effective and higher performance manner. Multicore processors today offer performance and flexibility on a scalable computing platform, which furthers this COTS trend. Computer platforms like desktop PCs, CompactPCI and PXI [ 1 ] (CompactPCI eXtensions for Instrumentation) deliver high-performance systems that allow for the leveraging of multicore processor capabilities in achieving highly realistic plant simulations for controller testing.