Search Results

The challenges of flex-fuel vehicle (FFV) emissions measurements have recently come to the forefront for the emissions testing community. The proliferation of ethanol blended gasoline in fractions as high as 85% has placed a new challenge in the path of accurate measures of NMHC and NMOG emissions. Test methods need modification to cope with excess amounts of water in the exhaust, assure transfer and capture of oxygenated compounds to integrated measurement systems (impinger and cartridge measurements) and provide modal emission rates of oxygenated species. Current test methods fall short of addressing these challenges. This presentation will discuss the challenges to FFV testing, modifications made to Ford Motor Company’s Vehicle Emissions Research Laboratory test cells, and demonstrate the improvements in recovery of oxygenated species from the vehicle exhaust system for both regulatory measurements and development measurements.

Atmospheric modelers and development engineers need accurate measures of NO2 emissions from motor vehicles. Due to the oxidative reaction of oxygen with NO, these measurements (typically taken from a bag sample) can be inaccurate if care is not taken to minimize the sample residence time in the bags. This reaction occurs slowly at low NO concentrations, however, at higher NO concentrations the reaction can rapidly speed up (for example, 50 ppm NO will experience a 10% concentration reduction in 6.5 minutes). This report explores the factors contributing to this artifact for emissions test cells. Estimates of the error in NO2 emission rate measurements for several scenarios are presented. Additionally, kinetic expressions of the reaction rate are shown to be fairly accurate for our test conditions, but should not be used in general without verification of the non-existence of competing, hindering or accelerating species within the sample bag.

The use of Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) for NOx emissions control has resulted in a new challenge for the emissions measurement community. Most SCR systems require injection of urea or ammonia into the exhaust stream. Residual ammonia present in vehicle exhaust can have deleterious effects on NOx analyzers using chemiluminescent detectors (CLD). Ammonia can poison converter catalysts in CLD NOx analyzers and may react with NO2 across the converter. Both of these issues lead to erroneous NOx measurements, as well as increased maintenance costs and downtime. This paper will describe the development and use of a low-cost, simple ammonia scrubber that can easily be integrated into sampling systems and requires little change in test cell maintenance procedures. Validation results show the scrubber to have capacity sufficient to last for a full day of testing of typical vehicles.

The performance of zeolite based, catalyzed hydrocarbon (HC) traps were evaluated with different inlet HC species and warm up profiles. Five different settings of cold–start spark timing were used each on separate FTP75 vehicle emission tests with constant neutral engine idle speed and fueling schedule. A test vehicle aftertreatment system that consisted of two converter assemblies, close-coupled and underbody, was modified by exchanging the bricks in the latter assembly with HC traps. With increasing spark retard from 9° BTDC to −17° BTDC, exhaust temperature increased, engine–out non–methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) emissions decreased, the concentration of large chain (C6+) HC species decreased and the small chain (C2–3) HC species increased. Lab flow reactor experiments showed that HC traps do not effectively manage small chain HC species with efficient adsorption or retention to conversion.

Dynamic single range analyzers are designed to cover the wide range of concentrations that once required multiple ranges. The use of single range analyzers is attractive because they can significantly reduce installation costs, gas cylinder charges, and facility storage space. The new technology relies on expansion of the digital dynamic range of the analyzer combined with the availability of a high accuracy gas divider with a 500 to one dilution ratio and a large number of cut points. A series of four MEXA 7000 series bag bench analyzers manufactured by Horiba Instruments, Inc., were evaluated to compare multiple range operation with single range operation. This report describes the operation of these analyzers and summarizes the evaluation methods and results. The evaluation verified the ability of the analyzers to operate in single range mode.

The new generation of emission analyzers, MEXA 7000 series, manufactured by Horiba Instruments, Incorporated, operate as single range instruments. The wide operational range of the new analyzers requires a new calibration/linearization tool, a new gas divider capable of providing more calibration points over a wider dynamic operational range. The operation of the new gas divider (Horiba GDC-703), based on mass flow control technology, provides 40 cut points with a minimum step size of 1/500, or 0.2%, of the calibration gas value. This paper describes the new Horiba gas divider, GDC-700 series. The evaluation proves the gas divider's viability for use in engine and vehicle emissions test laboratories. Extensive sets of data were collected to provide an evaluation of the gas divider over a wide range of operation for measurement linearity, repeatability, and accuracy.

In the engine and vehicle test procedures described in Parts 1065/1066 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) allows for the measurement of N2O emissions from sample storage bags, from a continuous dilute stream or a raw exhaust stream. Typically, batch (Bag) sampling has better accuracy and repeatability, but continuous sampling is more efficient in terms of test cell running time and provides test-mode emissions with good correlation to bag measurements. In this study, correlations between bag sampling and continuous dilute exhaust sampling were investigated using a fleet of vehicles with a wide range of N2O emission levels. Very good correlation between these two sampling methods was observed for the majority of tests conducted. In the best cases, differences in average N2O concentration levels measured by these two methods were less than +/− 1%.