Search Results

The accuracy of the Powertrain Control Module Event Data Recorder was tested during vehicle yaw and rotation on a flooded skid pad at the Michigan State Police training facility in Lansing, MI. The low friction of the skid pad allowed longer, slower rotations that allowed more detailed study of the behavior. The vehicle was deliberately put into rotation and allowed to rotate to rest under three different conditions: heavy throttle applied initially, heavy braking applied and held, and light to no throttle applied. Six runs were made under each condition. Data was collected from the PCM EDR and compared to a VBOX III (with IMU) 100 Hz differential GPS speed and yaw rate measurement system from which slip angle could be calculated. Graphs of PCM speed/brake/accel pedal data versus time showing VBOX speed and the cosine of the slip angle (where 1 = moving straight ahead and 0 = moving sideways) are presented.

The accuracy of the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) Event Data Recorder (EDR) was tested on a 2009 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor during both straight line steady state conditions and maximum ABS braking, at the Michigan State Police training facility in Lansing, MI. Six runs were made starting from 64 km/h (40 mph) and six runs starting from 96km/h (60 mph). Data was collected from the PCM EDR and the primary speed reference instrumentation was a Racelogic VBOX III (with IMU) 100 Hz differential GPS speed data acquisition system. On selected runs Radar was used as additional steady state speed verification and for the braking portion a Vericom 3000 was used to verify speed loss and calculated stop distance. Visible ABS tire marks were documented following each test, and the length of marks was compared to the calculated braking distance from each measurement device. Graphs of PCM speed/brake/accel pedal data versus VBOX speed over time are presented.