Search Results

In rear-end collisions, occupants move rearward relative to the vehicle interior, while compressing the seatback. In low-energy impacts, the stiffness of the non-frame seat components may influence the kinematic response of an occupant. Previous research has reported seat stiffness from experiments for a limited number of seats. Because passenger vehicle seats have evolved, this current work reports a range of seat stiffnesses for modern passenger vehicles. A portable measuring device to characterize vehicle seat stiffness was built to accommodate a wide range of vehicle types. The device measured simultaneously the force applied to the seat and the displacement of the seat cushion. Seats of sedans, crossovers, sport utility vehicles, minivans, and pickup trucks for model years between 2016 and 2020 were tested using the device. For each seat, three measurements were taken for four different seat regions: upper seatback, lower seatback, aft seat bottom and fore seat bottom.

In low-speed, rear-end collisions, the occupant in the target vehicle moves rearward relative to the vehicle and interacts with the seatback and seat bottom. Due to the direct interaction of the occupant with the seat, seat stiffness can affect the kinematics of the occupant. Generic seat stiffness values are often used as input parameters in computer programs, such as MADYMO, that are used to model low-speed, rear-end collisions and simulate occupant kinematics. To create an accident specific simulation, the model could take into account all aspects of the accident including the person involved, the subject vehicle, and the subject vehicle seat. Recent research has demonstrated that the seat stiffness of the compressible structure of the seat, comprised of foam and springs, can vary between vehicles, and also can vary between regions within a single vehicle seat.

Previous studies have shown that occupant kinematics in lateral impacts are different for near- and far-side occupants. Additionally, injuries to far-side occupants in high-speed lateral impacts have been better documented in the scientific literature; few studies have looked at low-speed far-side occupants. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of lumbar spine injury for restrained and unrestrained far-side occupants in low- to moderate- speed lateral impacts. The NASS/CDS database was queried for far-side occupants in lateral impacts for different levels of impact severity (categorized by Delta-V): 0 to 8 km/h, 8 to 16 km/h, 16 to 24 km/h and 24 to 32 km/h. To further understand the lumbar spine injuries sustained by occupants in real-world impacts, far-side lateral impact tests with ATDs from the NHTSA Biomechanics Test Database were used to estimate lumbar loads in generic far-side sled tests.

Although most of the research on vehicular rear impacts has focused on the neck, there is increasing current concern about the lumbar spine. Spinal bending superimposed with sudden spinal compression has been suggested as a mechanism of creating acute herniations on the rare occasion in which low back pain associated with an intervertebral disc herniation was reported. During automotive rear-impacts, the vehicle accelerations are directed anteriorly, and the seat backs deflect posteriorly. In vehicle seats equipped with floor-mounted seatbelt restraints, the pelvis is restrained by the seatback and seatbelt, while the torso ramps upward and rearward on the seatback during the rearward motion, producing tension in the lumbar spine. However, in an all-belts-to-seat arrangement, the lumbar spines may experience overall compressive and bending loads.

While adult head injuries have been studied over the past six decades, few studies have investigated pediatric head injury mechanics. This paper presents non-injurious head accelerations during various activities in a pediatric population. Six males and six females aged 8–11 years old were equipped with a validated head sensor package and head kinematics were measured while performing a series of playground-type activities. Maximum resultant values across all participants and activities were 25.7 g (range 3.0 g to 25.7 g), 16.0 rad/s (range 10.4 rad/s to 16.0 rad/s), and 1705 rad/s2 (range 520 rad/s2 to 1705 rad/s2) for linear acceleration, angular velocity, and angular acceleration, respectively. Mean maximum resultant values across all participants and activities were 9.7 g (range 2.1 g to 9.7 g) and 734 rad/s2 (range 188 rad/s2 to 734 rad/s2) for linear and angular acceleration, respectively.

During a motorcycle accident, a rider’s helmet may dissipate energy to reduce the likelihood of serious brain injury. Novelty helmets lack the energy-absorbing layer between the comfort liner and the outer shell of the helmet. In this study, we compared the injury mitigation capabilities and associated brain injury potential of novelty helmets to three US DOT-approved motorcycle helmets. The analysis was performed using a drop tower system. Helmeted Hybrid-III and magnesium head-forms were dropped onto a slab of asphalt with contact to the upper, back region of the helmets. The first drop height was chosen to simulate a fall from the typical seated height of a rider on a cruising style bike, and the second height was chosen to yield an impact speed that conformed to the DOT testing requirements, 6 meters per second (13.4 mph). Resultant accelerations, head injury criterion (HIC), and probability of an AIS 4+ brain injury were calculated for each drop test.

Several studies have sought to investigate the biomechanics associated with “whiplash syndrome” by evaluating head kinematics in simulated low-speed rear-end collisions. However, the present study is the first to comprehensively measure head accelerations in six degrees of freedom for the purpose of estimating upper neck loads. In the first phase of the study, nine volunteers were instrumented with a sensor package to measure three-dimensional linear accelerations and angular velocities of the head during rear-end impacts while riding an amusement park bumper car. In the second phase, thirty volunteers were instrumented with the same sensors during selected vigorous activities, including hopping and skipping rope. The linear and rotational head accelerations as well as the calculated upper neck forces and moments for the two groups are presented and compared.

Lateral head motions, torso motions, lateral neck bending angles, and electromyographic (EMG) activity patterns of five human volunteer passengers are compared to lateral motions of a Hybrid III ATD during right-left and left-right fishhook steering maneuvers leading to vehicular tip-up. While the ATD maintained relatively fixed lateral neck angles, live subjects leaned their heads slightly inward and actively utilized their neck musculature to stiffen their necks against the lateral inertial loads. Except for differences in neck lateral bending, the Hybrid III ATD reasonably reflects occupant kinematics during the pre-trip phase of on-road rollovers.