Search Results

Vehicle manufacturers conduct tests to develop crash sensing system calibrations. Ditch fall-over is one of a suite of laboratory tests used to develop rollover sensing calibrations that can trigger deployment of safety devices like roof rail airbags and seat belt pretensioners. The ditch fall-over test simulates a flat road followed by a ditch on one side of the road. The vehicle heads into the ditch and the driver applies swift steer input once the ditch slope is sensed. Typically, the steer input is applied when the two down-slope wheels on the ditch side enter the ditch. Multi-Body Dynamics (MBD) software can be used for virtual simulation of these test events. Conventionally in simulations, the vehicle-model is run without steer input and the marking line crossing time is observed/manually recorded from observation of simulation video. This recorded time is used to apply the steer input and the full event is then re-simulated.

Steady-state handling design targets are generally defined in the design of suspension and steering systems, which are achieved through kinematic and compliance analysis. It has been found that some vehicles that meet all steady-state handling design targets do not necessarily perform well in subjective evaluations by experts or delight customers in the marketplace. The vehicles that customer find desirable exhibit the desired transient handling behavior, which is what the drivers experience for a majority of the driving time. It is therefore necessary to understand how to evaluate, and most importantly, how to design and tune the chassis for the desired transient handling behavior. In this study, the key mechanisms associated with transient handling performance are presented. The appropriate handling maneuvers are determined through which vehicle transient behavior can be evaluated. The proper response channels to monitor and measure are selected.

A methodology involving Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) and Multi-body dynamic simulation is employed to tune a body-on-frame vehicle, for improved ride (shake) performance. The design space is limited to four sets of symmetric body mounts for a vehicle. The stiffness and damping characteristics of the mounts are the control factors in the virtual experiment. Variation of these design parameters from the nominal settings, as well as axle size, tire and wheel combinations, tire pressure, shock damping, and vehicle speed constitute the noise factors. This approach proves to be an excellent predictor of the vehicle behavior, by which much insight as to influence of each parameter on vehicle performance is gained. Ultimately, specific recommendations for the control factor settings are provided. Subsequent hardware builds show excellent agreement with the analytical model and suggested tuning.

In an endeavor to improve upon historically subjective and hardware-based steering tuning development, a team was formed to find an optimal and objective solution using Design For Six Sigma (DFSS). The goal was to determine the best valve assembly design within a hydraulic power-steering assist system to yield improved steering effort and feel robustness for all vehicle models in a future truck program. The methodology utilized was not only multifaceted with several Design of Experiments (DOEs), but also took advantage of a CAE-based approach leveraging modeling capabilities in ADAMS for simulating full-vehicle, On-Center Handling behavior. The team investigated thirteen control factors to determine which minimized a realistic, compounded noise strategy while also considering the ideal steering effort function (SEF) desired by the customer. In the end, it was found that response-dependent variability dominated the physics of our valve assembly design concept.

Steering Wheel Torsional Vibration (SWTV) at highway speed on smooth roads is one important attribute affecting vehicle refinement. To ensure desirable SWTV performance, achieve the best design compromises and minimize the development cost, specific design targets need to be defined and the proposed design needs to be assessed very early in the vehicle development cycle. In this paper, the fundamental dynamics of SWTV are analyzed and examples are given to demonstrate the strategies to reduce the SWTV response. Influence of design parameters on the SWTV response is predicted for four vehicle platforms. General guidelines for designing suspension and steering systems are discussed to ensure achieving SWTV targets.

High interest is expressed in using analytical models to eliminate costly driveline tests used to determine the stresses produced in the driveshaft and driveline during resonant operating conditions. This paper discusses an analytical model to simulate the driveline-bending integrity, test procedure. Three major subsystems are modeled in this analytical approach, namely powertrain, rear axle, and driveshaft. Imbalance masses were added on the driveshaft to induce the whirl motion of the driveshaft. The combination of nonlinear Multi-body System Simulation (MSS) and linear Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in the time domain was employed for the evaluation of the dynamic interaction between several parts.