Search Results

Tires are the only load path between the road and the vehicle's suspension and so play a key role in determining vehicle NVH performance. Tire structure and behavior include many nonlinear phenomena, such as rubber material response to load, tire contact patch conformity with road profile, and bulging of side walls. In addition to structural nonlinearities, the tire's rotational motion introduces nonlinear resonances that are dependent on vehicle speed, and also rotationally induced harmonics. When a tire rolls over a cleat, the rolling resonance at the spindle may vary with the vehicle's speed. Since tire behavior couples several nonlinear parameters, a numerical tire model that can consider physical characteristics such as, rolling resonance dependence on speed and the harmonic resonances, will definitely be helpful for improving vehicle NVH quality. This paper presents a study of a finite element tire model rolling over an impact cleat at different speeds.

Braking has a strong effect on a vehicle's front suspension loads when the vehicle is driven over a pothole. The suspension loads of a vehicle braking while going over a pothole are also affected by vehicle design, vehicle weight and speed. In this study a simplified suspension model is presented, which is then validated by the simulation of a vehicle model. The simplified suspension model provides an efficient approach to evaluate effects of braking on wheel rebound into potholes, which determines the magnitude of impact loads when the tires hit the pothole edge. The vehicle model is used not only to validate the simplified suspension model, but also to provide the information of wheel center loads in addition to the wheel position and velocity. The analysis using the vehicle model agrees with pothole test results. The study reveals how vehicle braking affects the wheel center longitudinal forces during the pothole impact.

The SAE Brake Linings Committee launched an evaluation of the current SAE standard J840 “Test Procedures for Brake Shoe and Lining Bonds,” specifically the bond plane shear test. The aim of the study was to identify what settings in the shear test lead to the most repeatable results for a variety of linings. An initial four factor two-level design of experiments (DOE) was conducted, with 15 pads sheared for each condition. The DOE looked at pad material type (NAO and semi-metallic), backing plate attachment type (integrally molded and mechanical retention system), ram offset position (1.0 mm and 4.0 mm) and normal pressure (0 and 0.5 N/mm2). The test measured shear force and percentage material retention for each pad tested. The objective of the DOE was to guide revision of the SAE J840 shear test procedure. For example, the application of a normal force raises the nominal value of the shear force by 30-50%, and reduces the variability of the test results.

Brake squeal has been a chronic customer complaint, often appearing high on the list of items that reduce customers' satisfaction with their vehicles. Brake squeal can emanate from either a drum brake or a disc brake even though the geometry of the two systems is significantly different. A drum brake generates friction within a cylindrical drum interacting with two semi-circular linings. A disc brake consists of a flat disc and two flat pads. The observed squeal behavior in a vehicle differs somewhat between drum and disc brakes. A drum brake may have a loud noise coming from three or more squeal frequencies, whereas a disc brake typically has one or two major squeal frequencies making up the noise. A good understanding of the operational deflection shapes of the brake components during noise events will definitely aid in design to reduce squeal occurrences and improve product quality.

This paper presents the development of a hardware in the loop (HIL) simulation system for evaluating and optimizing the interactions of the brake system with the vehicle. This unique HIL set-up consists of an inertial brake dynamometer with a brake corner module, an electronic control unit, a real time 3D total vehicle model and a computer system with a high-speed operating platform. The HIL system simultaneously confers advantages of both computer modeling and hardware testing. It offers the capability to do upfront design and assess performance of the foundation brake hardware and the chassis controls, as well as their interactions, in advance of testing and tuning a vehicle. This powerful tool enables reduction in development time and cost. A simple example of applying the brake dynamometer HIL system will be presented.

Pedal feel is one of the first customer touch points during a driving experience, and as such can be an important contributor to quality perception and customer appeal. Many brake system design characteristics contribute to pedal feel, and although not the largest contributors, the brake linings play a role. Friction material properties that influence pedal feel include: friction level, in-stop friction rise, ambient compressibility and hot compressibility. These properties have been measured on a series of commercial friction materials intended for passenger cars and light trucks. Vehicle tests have also been performed to compare objective and subjective evaluations of pedal feel for the different linings on the same vehicle brake system. The testing was designed to identify the contribution of the linings to the brake system's responsiveness and feel. This paper will discuss the correlation between friction material properties and vehicle tests for pedal feel.

In order to assess the amount of airborne particulate matter (PM) attributable to vehicle disk brakes, a system was devised for collecting brake wear debris on a laboratory brake dynamometer. The brake dynamometer test hardware was enclosed and vented through a duct in which the airflow was controlled to ensure isokinetic sampling. Two brake dynamometer simulations were implemented: urban driving (low velocity, low g) and the Auto Motor und Sport (AMS, high velocity, high g). These test procedures were performed repeatedly on the brake system hardware of vehicles utilizing three different friction material types: low-metallic, semi-metallic, and non-asbestos organic (NAO). Airborne brake wear was collected on filters and via other airborne PM sampling techniques. Larger, non-airborne wear debris was collected from the wheel, below the brake, and brushed off the hardware. Considering the effect of the wheel, 50-70% of the collected wear debris was airborne PM.

Friction behavior is one of the most critical factors in brake system design and performance. For up-front design and system modeling it is desirable to be able to describe a lining's frictional behavior as a function of the local conditions, such as contact pressure, temperature and sliding speed. Typically, frictional performance is assessed using brake dynamometer testing of full-scale hardware, and an average friction value is used during brake system development. This traditional approach yields an average brake friction coefficient that is hardware-dependent and fails to capture in-stop friction variation; it is also unavailable in advance of component testing, ruling out true up-front design and prediction. To address these shortcomings, a scaled inertial brake dynamometer was used to determine the frictional characteristics of candidate lining materials.