Search Results

The differences in hydrocarbons (HCs) emitted by gasoline (E0) and ethanol (EtOH) blend fuels from flex-fuel capable engines can lead to differences in the performance of aftertreatment devices. Vehicle emission results have shown either better performance on E0 compared to E85 or vice versa, dependent on the vehicle calibration. In order to separate the impact of the vehicle and the catalyst, a laboratory study was conducted to evaluate performance on a pulse-flame (pulsator) reactor and compare reactivity towards E0 and E85 (85% EtOH-15% E0) exhaust. The catalysts evaluated were substrate-only, washcoat-only and fully formulated catalysts that had been aged either on a pulsator reactor or dynamometer engine. Catalyst performance was evaluated with light-off tests utilizing both slow and fast temperature ramp rates.

This paper summarizes results from a large study on the release of NOx from a lean NOx trap during rich purges. Under certain purge conditions, some NOx trap formulations have the propensity to release some of the NOx stored during previous lean operation without reducing it. This purge NOx release was examined for different NOx trap formulations. The purge NOx release was evaluated for one of the formulations as a function of several variables, including the aging condition of the trap, the trap temperature, the trap volume, the purge A/F ratio, the purge flow rate, and the amount of NOx stored. The effect of hot lean pretreatments on the purge NOx release was studied. In addition, the effect of the rhodium level on the purge NOx release was examined. Mechanisms for the NOx release are proposed that are consistent with the observed data. The results indicate that the purge NOx release is very low for thermally aged traps and is primarily a concern for fresh or stabilized traps.