Search Results

Oblique crashes to the vehicle front corner may not be characteristic of either frontal or side impacts. This research evaluated occupant response in oblique crashes for a driver, rear adult passenger, and a rear child passenger. Occupant responses and injury potential were evaluated for seating positions as either a far-or near-side occupant. Two crash tests were conducted with a subcompact car. The vehicle’s longitudinal axis was oriented 45 degrees to the direction of travel on a moving platform and pulled into a wall at 56 km/h. Dummies utilized for the seating positions were an adult dummy (50th-percentile-HIII and THOR-Alpha) for the front-left (driver) position, 5th-percentile-female-HIII for the right-rear position, and a 3-year-old HIII for the left-rear position.

The purpose of the study was to distinguish the role of vehicle structure in frontal impacts in published coded National Automotive Sampling System (NASS-CDS) data. The criteria used: Collision Deformation Classification (CDC) coding rules, crush profile locator data and the projected location of longitudinal structural members in models of vehicle class sizes used by NASS-CDS. Two classifiers were developed to augment the CDC system. The Coincidence classifier indicates the relationship between the quadrant of the clock face the crash vector originates in and the aspect of the end plane the center of damage is located. It has three values: Linear (12 o'clock impacts) Consistent and Variant ("oblique" Principal Directions of Force or PDOFs). The second classifier indicates the number of longitudinal members engaged: 0, 1 or 2. NASS-CDS data for sample years 2005 to 2009 was filtered for occupants involved in impacts with the highest ranked speed change assigned to the front-end plane.

The purpose of the study was to identify all small overlap impacts using published coded NASS-CDS data. Three sets of criteria were used: CDC measurements; crush profiles for frontal impacts; and crush profiles for oblique side impacts to the fender component. All criteria were applied to passenger and non-passenger cars and their different vehicle class sizes. Data were analyzed based on fatalities and different levels of MAIS trauma. The overall data set based on CDC codes for 2005 to 2008 NASS-CDS data had 9,206 MAIS=0; 13,522 MAIS=1-2; 3,600 MAIS=3-6; 1,092 MAIS=7; and 961 fatal cases. For the weighted ensemble, these data were: 5,800,295; 4,324,773; 269,042; 219,481; and 44,906 cases, respectively. However, these cases reduced to 1071, 1468, 364, 82, and 87 raw cases with the application of the CDC criteria for frontal impacts.

Inertial loading of the head-neck complex occurs in rear impacts wherein the head and neck of the occupant are initially subjected to rearward forces. Epidemiological evidence exists to demonstrate the significance and societal impact of these injuries [4]. From a clinical perspective, trauma secondary to inertial loads belongs to the lower end of the Abbreviated Injury Scale, and no specific diagnostic techniques are available to quantitatively document the injury. Furthermore, identification of the mechanisms of injury and derivation of injury thresholds are limited. In fact, there is a paucity of literature focusing on the reproduction of rear impact-induced neck injuries due to a single-event rear impact. Because the impact acceleration is transmitted to the head from the torso via the cervical column, the components of the human neck play a role in the mechanics of trauma.

The objective of the present study was to determine the kinematics of the human head-neck complex with specific reference to posterior facet joints as a function of rear impact acceleration. Six intact human head-neck complexes were prepared by fixing the first thoracic vertebra in polymethylmethacrylate. The specimens were oriented such that the Frankfurt plane was horizontal and the cervico-thoracic disc was at an angle of 25 degrees to simulate the normal driving position. Retroreflective targets were inserted to the cervical vertebrae. The specimens were subjected to simulated rear impact accelerations using a minisled apparatus. A series of tests were conducted with velocities of 2.1, 4.6, 6.6, 9.3, and 12.4 km/h. In this study, to achieve the objective, results are presented on the facet joint motions at the C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7 levels as a function of change in velocity.

The objective of this study was to subject small female and large male cadavers to simulated rear impact, document soft-tissue injuries to the neck, determine the kinematics, forces and moments at the occipital condyles, and evaluate neck injury risks using peak force, peak tension and normalized tension-extension criteria. Five unembalmed intact human cadavers (four small females and one large male) were prepared using accelerometers and targets at the head, T1, iliac crest, and sacrum. The specimens were placed on a custom- designed seat without head restraint and subjected to rear impact using sled equipment. High-speed cameras were used for kinematic coverage. After the test, x-rays were obtained, computed tomography scans were taken, and anatomical sections were obtained using a cryomicrotome. Two female specimens were tested at 4.3 m/s (mean) and the other two were tested at 6.8 m/s (mean), and one large male specimen was subjected to 6.6 m/s velocity.

The purpose of this study was to determine neck strength characteristics of children indirectly using scaling relationships through a caprine animal model. Because of the necessity to evaluate airbag designs for injury risk to the out- of-position child, a strong foundation of experimental data is needed to obtain appropriate tolerance values. Cadaver caprine cervical spines of different ages were tested mechanically in non-destructive bending and destructive tensile modes. Injuries induced in destructive testing such as endplate failure and ligament tears were consistent with clinical observations. Specimens demonstrated statistically significant increased strength characteristics with age. Scaling relationships were developed with respect to the adult specimens. For the tensile failure load the scaling percentages were 78%, 38%, 20%, and 12% for the twelve-, six-, three-, and one-year-old, respectively.