Search Results

This research examines the effects of impactor characteristics on the calculated structural stiffness parameters A and B for the struck sides of late-model vehicles. This study was made possible by crash testing performed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration involving side impacts of the same vehicle line with both a rigid pole and with a moving deformable barrier. Twenty-nine crash test pairs were identified for 2018 model-year vehicles. Of 60 total tests, 49 were analyzed. Test data for 19 vehicles impacted in both modes resulted in A and B values considered to be valid. Classifying these 19 vehicles according to the categories defined by Siddall and Day, only Class 2 multipurpose vehicles were represented by enough vehicles (10) to search for trends within a given vehicle category. For these vehicles, more scatter in the results was observed in both A and B values for the MDB impacts compared to the pole impacts.

Crash tests of vehicles by striking deformable barriers are specified by Government programs such as FMVSS 214, FMVSS 301 and the Side Impact New Car Assessment Program (SINCAP). Such tests result in both crash partners absorbing crush energy and moving after separation. Compared with studying fixed rigid barrier crash tests, the analysis of the energy-absorbing behavior of the vehicle side (or rear) structure is much more involved. Described in this paper is a methodology by which analysts can use such crash tests to determine the side structure stiffness characteristics for the specific struck vehicle. Such vehicle-specific information allows the calculation of the crush energy for the particular side-struck vehicle during an actual collision – a key step in the reconstruction of that crash.

Crash tests of vehicles by striking deformable barriers are specified by Government programs such as FMVSS 214, FMVSS 301 and the Side Impact New Car Assessment Program (SINCAP). Such tests result in both crash partners absorbing crush energy and moving after separation. Compared with studying fixed rigid barrier crash tests, the analysis of the energy-absorbing behavior of the vehicle side (or rear) structure is much more involved. Described in this paper is a methodology by which analysts can use such crash tests to determine the side structure stiffness characteristics for the specific struck vehicle. Such vehicle-specific information allows the calculation of the crush energy for the particular side-struck vehicle during an actual collision – a key step in the reconstruction of that crash.

Crush energy assessment methods rely on the characterization of a vehicle’s structure, through a comparison with crash tests of a similar vehicle. For frontal impacts, the vast majority of these tests involve a flat rigid barrier. When the reconstructionist is presented with a frontal underride/override crash, however, the structural load pattern and the deformation mode suggest that the comparison with flat barrier tests may not be valid. This has been confirmed by prior studies. With few exceptions, for any given vehicle, there are no crash data in an underride/override mode that are useful for analysis purposes. The purpose of this research was to bridge the gap so that flat barrier data, specific to the vehicle in question, could be applied to underride/override cases. This entailed the development of a measurement protocol, a structural model for such crashes, and a procedure for analyzing the load cell data that exist for many barrier crash tests.

In frontal crashes, lateral deformations can occur as a result of various mechanisms. Unfortunately, the crush energy associated with such deformations cannot be assessed as long as the structural properties are unknown. That has been the situation to date, due to the lack of appropriate crash test data. The present research attempts to address this deficit. A passenger car was crash-tested in a mode designed to induce lateral deformations that are significant compared to longitudinal crush. This was done via a series of three repeated impacts on the same vehicle so as to obtain, in a cost-effective manner, structural characterization data at increasing crash severities. Various cause-and-effect relationships (structural characterization models) were considered with an eye to selecting the one that best predicts the crush energy. Insights obtained from analyzing the behavior of the front structure are presented.

Thanks to years of research and development by vehicle manufacturers, suppliers, legislation, and the entire safety community, the side airbag has become a critical safety device to reduce injury and save lives. This new collection of technical research highlights the progression of these essential safety features, providing a complete and thorough perspective through the analysis of both early patents and recent side airbag system developments. Advances in Side Airbag Systems begins with an introduction by editor Donald E. Struble, chronicling the progress made since the mid-1980s in offering improved side impact protection to the motoring public. Authored by leading experts in their respective fields, this book features a comprehensive collection of 26 landmark technical papers. Its scope includes not only thorax airbags, but other inflatable devices designed for side impacts and rollovers.

Due to the upgrade of FMVSS 214 and the emergence of side NCAP tests, there is a growing body of crash test data on vehicle side structures. Such data would be very useful to reconstructionists, except that the struck vehicle behavior is masked, in part, by the use of a deformable moving barrier in the test. The post-impact dynamics and the energy absorption by the barrier itself must be accounted for if the desired vehicle structural characterization is to be extracted. Attempts prior to this paper to achieve a side structure characterization have dealt with these issues by invoking various simplifying assumptions. Unfortunately, these have not been supported by a foundation in either physics or measurement. Questions have also been raised whether prior characterizations of the barrier face are appropriate, in view of the prior crash modes being so unlike the FMVSS 214 test. To address these issues, crash tests of the barrier itself, in an appropriate crash mode, have been conducted.

A key aspect of accident reconstruction is the calculation of how much kinetic energy is dissipated as crush. By far the most widely used methods are derivatives of Campbell’s work, in which a linear relationship between residual crush and closing speed is shown to imply an underlying linearity between force and crush. “Consant-stiffness model” is the term used for such a representation of structural behavior. Difficulties arise, however, when significant non-uniformities are present in the crush pattern (as in narrow-object and/or side impacts, for example). The term “residual crush” becomes more ambiguous. Do we mean maximum crush, area-weighted average crush, or some other measure of residual deformation? And is it sufficient to represent the non-uniform crush pattern by a single parameter? Such considerations led to a re-development of the fundamental structural models, with an eye to determining whether the classical constant-stiffness model is the most appropriate.