Search Results

Implementation of engine turnoff at idle is desirable to gain improvements in vehicle fuel economy. There are a number of alternatives for implementation of the restarting function, including the existing cranking motor, a 12V or 36V belt-starter, a crankshaft integrated-starter-generator (ISG), and other, more complex hybrid powertrain architectures. Of these options, the 12V belt-alternator-starter (BAS) offers strong potential for fast, quiet starting at a lower system cost and complexity than higher-power 36V alternatives. Two challenges are 1) the need to accelerate a large engine to idle speed quickly, and 2) dynamic torque control during the start for smoothness. In the absence of a higher power electrical machine to accomplish these tasks, combustion-assisted starting has been studied as a potential method of aiding a 12V accessory drive belt-alternator-starter in the starting process on larger engines.

Optimization of engine startup from crank to catalyst light-off is essential for achieving low emissions. For Spark Ignition Direct Injected (SIDI) engines, this requires optimization of the piston crown features, spray characteristics and control strategy. In this case study, high speed endoscope imaging was used to provide a qualitative confirmation of CFD spray predictions and to provide insight into engine starting in a “real” engine environment. The effect of piston feature was initially evaluated in a single cylinder engine running the dual-injection catalyst heating mode. The piston features were also assessed at part load and wide open throttle. The videos of the spray development were compared to CFD predictions. In the example case reported here, endoscope imaging showed that the baseline piston bowl was not effective in deflecting the spray toward the spark plug. Moving the piston bowl toward the injector gave a visible improvement in the spray deflection.

Automotive manufacturers relentlessly explore engine technology combinations to achieve reduced fuel consumption under continued regulatory, societal and economic pressures. For example, technologies enabling advanced combustion modes, increased expansion to effective compression ratio and reduced parasitics continue to be developed and integrated within conventional and hybrid propulsion strategies across the industry. A high-efficiency gasoline engine capable for use in conventional or hybrid electric vehicle platforms is highly desirable. This paper is the second of two papers describing the multi-cylinder integration of a technology package combining lean-stratified combustion with Miller cycle for downsized boosted applications. The first paper describes the design, analysis and single-cylinder testing conducted to down-select the combustion system deployed to the multi-cylinder engine.

Automotive manufacturers relentlessly explore engine technology combinations to achieve reduced fuel consumption under continued regulatory, societal and economic pressures. For example, technologies enabling advanced combustion modes, increased expansion to effective compression ratio, and reduced parasitics continue to be developed and integrated within conventional and hybrid propulsion strategies across the industry. A high-efficiency gasoline engine capable for use in conventional or hybrid electric vehicle platforms is highly desirable. This paper is the first to two papers describing the development of a combustion system combining lean-stratified combustion with Miller cycle for downsized boosted applications. The work was completed under a multi-year US DOE project. The goal was to define a light-duty engine package capable of achieving a 35% fuel economy improvement at US Tier 3 emission standards over a naturally aspirated stoichiometric baseline vehicle.

The majority of first-generation Spark Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI) engines use Side-Injection, High Pressure Direct Injection (HPDI) combustion systems. Central-Injection is emerging as an alternative second-generation system. Side-Injection systems have an advantage in injector and spark plug packaging and cooling. Emission control systems are available for meeting current Japanese and European regulations. Central-Injection systems require the injector and spark plug to be closely spaced in the hotter and more crowded valve bridge area. This can pose potential development challenges with injector deposits and spark plug fouling. A potential benefit of Central-Injection is improved containment of the charge within the piston bowl, without wall guiding, resulting in lower emissions for future applications. This paper presents results from three different engines used to assess Central-Injection as a second-generation SIDI technology.